Preparatory Workshop for the Seventh Conference of Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Manila, Philippines, 15-16 September 2016 : meeting report

Meeting Report

PREPARATORY WORKSHOP FOR THE SEVENTH CONFERENCE OF PARTIES TO THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL

15-16 September 2016 Manila, Philippines

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REGIONAL OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC RS/2016/GE/51(PHL) English only

MEETING REPORT

PREPARATORY WORKSHOP FOR THE SEVENTH CONFERENCE OF PARTIES TO THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL

Convened by: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REGIONAL OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC

Manila, Philippines 15–16 September 2016

Not for sale Printed and distributed by: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific Manila, Philippines January 2017

NOTE

The views expressed in this report are those of the participants of the Preparatory Workshop for the Seventh Conference of Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and do not necessarily reflect the policies of the conveners.

This report has been prepared by the World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific for Member States in the Region and for those who participated in the Preparatory Workshop for the Seventh Conference of Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Manila, Philippines, from 15 to 16 September 2016.

CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Meeting organization ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Meeting objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 2. PROCEEDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Opening session ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Agenda 2. Applications for the status of observer to the Conference of Parties........................ 2 2.3 Agenda 4. Global progress report in implementation of the WHO FCTC, followed by a ......... general debate .......................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Agenda 5. Treaty instruments and technical matters ................................................................. 3 2.4.1 5.1 Status of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products ................ 3 2.4.2 5.2 Impact assessment of the WHO FCTC: report by the expert group ................... 4 2.4.3 5.4 Further development of the partial guidelines for implementation of Articles 9 and 10: report by the working group and report by WHO ............................... 4 2.4.4 5.6 Economically sustainable alternatives to tobacco growing (in relation to Articles 17 and 18 of the WHO FCTC) .............................................................. 5 2.4.5 5.3 Implementation of Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC ............................................. 5 2.4.6 5.5.1 Control and prevention of waterpipe tobacco products: report by WHO ........... 6 2.4.7 5.5.2 Electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems: report by WHO ..................................................................................... 6 2.4.8 5.9 Tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship: depiction of tobacco in entertainment media (item proposed by a Party) ................................................ 6 2.4.9 5.7 Implementation of Article 19 of the WHO FCTC: “Liability”: report by the expert group ........................................................................................................ 7 2.4.10 5.8 Addressing gender-specific risks when developing tobacco control strategies .. 7 2.5 Agenda 6. Reporting, implementation assistance and international cooperation ...................... 8 2.5.1 6.1 Reporting arrangements under the WHO FCTC: report by the expert group ..... 8 2.5.2 6.2 International cooperation for implementation of the WHO FCTC, including the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the global NCD targets and human rights ................................................................. 8 2.5.3 6.3 South-South and Triangular cooperation ............................................................ 8 2.5.4 6.4 Sustainable measures to strengthen implementation of the WHO FCTC: report by the working group................................................................................ 9 2.5.5 6.5 Financial resources and mechanism of assistance............................................. 10 2.5.6 6.6 Issues related to the implementation of the WHO FCTC and settlement of disputes concerning the implementation or application of the Convention ...... 10 2.5.7 6.7 Trade and investment issues.............................................................................. 10 2.6 Agenda 7. Budgetary and institutional matters ....................................................................... 11 2.6.1 7.1 Performance report for the 2014–2015 workplan and budget........................... 11 2.6.2 7.2 Interim performance report for the 2016–2017 workplan and budget .............. 11 2.6.3 7.3 Payment of the voluntary assessed contributions and measures to reduce Parties in arrears ................................................................................................ 11 2.6.4 7.4 Proposed workplan and budget for the financial period 2018–2019................. 11 2.6.5 7.5 Convention Secretariat’s fund-raising efforts and collaborative work ............. 12

2.7 2.8 3.

Process and methodology to conduct the performance of the Head of the Convention Secretariat ...................................................................................... 12 2.6.7 7.7 Review of accreditation of nongovernmental organizations with the status of observer to the COP ...................................................................................... 12 2.6.8 7.8 Review of accreditation of intergovernmental organizations with the status of observer to the COP ...................................................................................... 13 2.6.9 7.9 Maximizing transparency of Parties’ delegations, IGOs, NGOs and civil society groups during sessions of the COP and meetings of its subsidiary bodies ................................................................................................................ 13 2.6.10 7.10 Possible amendments to the rules of the procedure .......................................... 13 2.6.11 7.11 Strengthening synergy between the Conference of Parties and the World Health Assembly ............................................................................................... 13 2.6.12 7.12 Relationship of the Convention Secretariat with other international entities.... 14 2.6.13 7.13 Hosting arrangements between the Convention Secretariat and WHO ............ 14 Agenda 8. Date and place of the 8th session of the COP ........................................................ 14 Nominations for Elected Officials ........................................................................................... 14

2.6.6 7.6

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 15 3.1 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Recommendations for Member States .......................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Recommendations for WHO Secretariat ...................................................................... 18 3.3.3 Recommendations for the Convention Secretariat ....................................................... 18

ANNEXES: Annex 1. List of Participants ................................................................................................................ 19 Annex 2. Programme of Activities ....................................................................................................... 23

Keyword: International cooperation / Tobacco industry / Tobacco products / Tobacco use – prevention and control

SUMMARY

The Preparatory Workshop for the Seventh Conference of Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control was convened to allow Parties an opportunity to prepare for the Seventh Conference of Parties (COP7) to be held in Delhi, India, 7–12 November 2016. Among other issues, the COP will consider further development of the partial Article 9 and 10 guidelines proposed by the working group. Updates on the status of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products, adopted at the COP5 in 2012, will be provided during the COP7. Furthermore, Article 5.3 on tobacco industry interferences will be an important element to be discussed in every aspect of tobacco control. Twenty participants attended the workshop, representing 12 countries in the region; observers were also present from two non-governmental organizations accredited by the COP. Meeting Objectives: 1) to familiarize participants with and clarify questions related to the agenda items of the COP7; 2) to raise concerns, issues and agreements related to the agenda items of the COP7 relevant among Parties for the Western Pacific Region; and 3) to strengthen regional action on implementing Article 5.3 (tobacco industry interference) as a highlighted item for COP7. Recommendations for Member States: 1) Parties are encouraged to prepare a joint statement to highlight regional progress in the implementation of the WHO FCTC. 2) Parties are encouraged to specify types of support they would require to accelerate the implementation of the WHO FCTC. 3) Parties are encouraged to further pursue full implementation of the Article 5.3 guidelines. 4) Parties are encouraged to share existing resources (e.g., case studies and tools) through the Convention Secretariat to assist other Parties in need. Recommendation for WHO: 1) Provide support to Parties, as appropriate, in preparing their participation at the COP7. Recommendations for the Convention Secretariat: 1) The Convention Secretariat is committed to supporting Parties upon request, working closely with WHO regional and country offices. 2) While submitting periodic reporting is a treaty obligation for the Parties, increased submission of the report by Parties should also be sought further by the Convention Secretariat. 3) The Convention Secretariat was also requested to share relevant information with the responsible officer to facilitate the Pre-COP7 meeting in Fiji. 1

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1

Meeting organization

The Seventh Conference of Parties (COP7) will be held in Delhi, India, 7–12 November 2016. The conference will review the implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products. To date, 180 Parties have ratified the FCTC. The Preparatory Workshop (Pre-COP7) was convened to allow Parties an opportunity to prepare for the conference. 1.2 Meeting objectives

The objectives of the workshop were: 1) To familiarize participants with and clarify questions related to the agenda items of the COP7; 2) to raise concerns, issues and agreements related to the agenda items of the COP7 relevant among Parties for the Western Pacific Region; and 3) to strengthen regional action on implementing Article 5.3 (tobacco industry interference) as a highlighted item for COP7.

2. PROCEEDINGS

2.1

Opening session

Dr Susan Mercado opened the workshop and welcomed all participants. Head of the Convention Secretariat, Dr Vera Luiza da Costa e Silva, also welcomed participants via a video message. Participants were introduced. The list of participants is available at Annex 1. The programme of activities is available at Annex 2. Ms Guangyuan Liu gave an overview of the COP7 arrangements and programme of work. To ensure balance of work among the two committees, Committee A will be responsible for treaty instruments and technical matters under provisional agenda item 5, and for matters related to reporting, implementation assistance and international cooperation under provisional agenda item 6. Committee B will be in charge of budgetary and institutional matters under provisional agenda item 7. Provisional agenda items 1 to 4, and 8 to 11 will be considered in plenary. There will also be a marketplace at which members of the Parties may meet informally. The Marketplace will be composed of booths loosely clustered by thematic groups covering a variety of diverse topics and issues. Regional groups will also have the opportunity to meet. 2.2 Agenda 2. Applications for the status of observer to the Conference of Parties

All new applicants for observer status to the COP are governed under items 30.1 and 30.2 of the Rules of Procedure (RoP). At COP6, it was decided that the application from the East African Community (EAC) would be deferred till COP7. The Bureau recommended that it be rejected due to a lack of a 2

decision from a governing body on its application. In total, 16 applications were received from nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and three were accepted: American Cancer Society, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, and Vision Mondiale de la Santé (World Health Vision). The Secretariat has developed criteria to guide decisions on applications and re-applications. The COP was further invited to give guidance on setting criteria on what types of organizations can apply. For example, according to the RoP, applicants have to be regional organizations; national or subnational NGOs are not eligible. The challenge is making the distinction between global and regional NGOs—a review of activities should show activities that are international. A few applicants were discussed, including the Philippine Tobacco Institute, which had declared itself as not having any conflicts of interest. However, it was pointed out that in reality, there is a known conflict of interest. 2.3 Agenda 4. Global progress report in implementation of the WHO FCTC, followed by a general debate A presentation was made on the Global Progress Report (GPR) to be submitted to COP7. The 2016 GPR was based on biennial implementation reports provided by 133 Parties, representing 74% of the Parties. Articles 8 and 11 of the FCTC had the highest implementation rates of at least 5%, and progress has been made on Articles 6, 15, 17 and 19. However, Article 13, which is a time-bound article, still has a low implementation rate. All the implementation reports submitted by the Parties are available online (http://apps.who.int/fctc/implementation/database). The full GPR report will be made available before COP7. It was pointed out that the reports are a result of self-reporting and may not reflect the accuracy of the data or identify data gaps. An expert group under WHO FCTC has recommended the establishment of a review committee to be made up of experts and Parties to review the reports; the COP will make the final decision regarding this recommendation. The importance of engaging civil society organizations was also recognized. In New Zealand, two individuals from civil society were asked to provide review independently from the Ministry of Health. The Republic of Korea Ministry of Health requested experts to review the progress report and, as a result, quality and accuracy were improved. Despite active outreach during meetings, workshops and webinars, there are still Parties that have not submitted their report, and there are no sanctions or mechanisms in place to address this challenge. 2.4 2.4.1 Agenda 5. Treaty instruments and technical matters 5.1 Status of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products

The Convention Secretariat gave an overview and summary of the status of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products. Activities that have been undertaken since COP6 include the following: 1) Organized a series of multisectoral, subregional workshops for Parties. 2) Established a panel of experts to the Protocol. 3) Promoted the Protocol at high-level global events, including with customs, law enforcement and other relevant governmental sectors. 4) Prepared an expert and technical paper(s), model instruments for accession in all six languages, and a case study on becoming a Party in Central America. 5) Concluded discussions with the European Union on a grant for work on the Protocol.

3

It was found that among all regions, assistance is needed in the following areas: translating the Protocol into simple language to aid Ministries in better understanding what it means; implementing a tracking and tracing system; improving information sharing; and producing best practices of and cost analysis for implementation of the Protocol. Two options were presented in relation to the entry into force of the Protocol and the timing of the Meeting of Parties (MOP); these proposed options may come up for consideration during COP7. 2.4.2 5.2 Impact assessment of the WHO FCTC: report by the expert group

An independent expert group prepared a report on the impact of the WHO FCTC from the following sources: global evidence review of scientific studies (conducted by the ITC Project); commissioned reports, government reports and other literature; and missions to 12 selected countries. The prevalence of smoking has decreased along with implementation of the Articles. Article 5.3 has been important in resisting industry pressure; however, it appears that the industry has intensified its opposition with new and aggressive approaches. It would be good for Parties to share their experiences in implementing Article 5.3 with one another. The following recommendations were made by the expert group: 1) 2) 3) 4) Parties should strongly support action towards swifter and stronger implementation. Article 5.3 should be fully observed by all sectors of government. Increase tax and align taxation with Article 6 guidelines. Individual countries, especially lower- and middle-income countries, should be provided more technical support in key areas (e.g., taxation) and to help them respond to emerging challenges (e.g., non-cigarettes and new products). 5) Parties should develop national surveillance systems to assess trends, evaluate measures and make full use of the information. 2.4.3 5.4 Further development of the partial guidelines for implementation of Articles 9 and 10: report by the working group and report by WHO A report was presented covering implementation of Articles 9 and 10, which pertain to regulation of the contents of tobacco products and regulation of tobacco product disclosures. The 9th meeting of the Working Group (WG) was held in Antalya, Turkey, in February 2016, and was attended by 25 Parties and three facilitators. The WG discussed the latest research on the reduction of tobacco addictiveness, and agreed to present draft text to COP7 related to tobacco addictiveness. It was also agreed that smokeless tobacco products fall under the definition of tobacco products and are therefore included in the Protocol. Questions were raised about whether waterpipe tobacco products would fall under the definition, but this is a complex topic that may require more discussion. New products such as “heatnot-burn” products are becoming popular among smokers in Japan and the tobacco industry markets these heavily. Future work will need to take these new products into account. The WG is requesting guidance regarding tobacco-free waterpipe products and the use of charcoal and re-use of water and other fluids in waterpipe smoking, as to whether these design features should be considered for the purposes of Articles 9 and 10.

4

2.4.4 5.6 Economically sustainable alternatives to tobacco growing (in relation to Articles 17 and 18 of the WHO FCTC) Progress in implementation of Articles 17 and 18 has been slow and currently these Articles are only at 18% and 24% implementation rates, respectively. To aid in implementation, an international database is being organized to allow Parties to access information on best practices. Awareness is being raised on this issue, and international cooperation is taking place. For instance, a South-South and Triangular cooperation meeting resulted in a project to design country-specific action plans for recipient countries to develop programmes on alternative livelihoods. Brazil was identified as the country provider of assistance and agreed to share its experience on its National Diversification Programme for the implementation of Article 17 with Jamaica, Philippines and Uruguay. The Secretariat is also signing an interagency collaboration agreement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) to update its 2003 study “Projections of Tobacco Production, Consumption and Trade”. Other collaborations include working with the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) to elaborate on a report that maps the tobacco global value chain; gathering information on implementation of Articles 17 and 18 from those European Union Member States that produce raw tobacco; and exploring possible cooperation with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Secretariat is also collaborating with the International Labour Organization (ILO) to gather data on jobs related to tobacco production and manufacturing; the issue of child labour was brought up as a concern not addressed in the report. 2.4.5 5.3 Implementation of Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC

The Secretariat presented its findings on the implementation of Article 5.3, “Protection of public health policies with respect to tobacco control from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry”. A new report has been published that examines the level of tobacco industry interference with international organizations such as intergovernmental and nongovernmental groups. This report is available online (http://bit.ly/29UXMvw). The Secretariat has also provided tools to assist the Parties; this list of resources is also available on a Tools & Knowledge hub (http://bit.ly/2cCSR5v). However, it was pointed out that there may not be full awareness of the availability of these resources. Other projects include the establishment of tobacco industry monitoring systems or observatories, as well as regional meetings and needs and impact assessment missions to raise awareness. The Southeast Asian Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA) has a link on its website to best practices. Some suggestions that arose from the discussion include: launch campaigns to publicize policies; include case studies or examples for Parties to take note of, including sharing notes taken from meetings with the tobacco industry; share guidelines developed by different countries; include a lunch briefing at COP7 to discuss this agenda item. The question of whether COP7 should be open to the public was brought up. The decision had been made to allow the public to attend as long as they sign a form stating any links to the tobacco industry; this is to facilitate maximum transparency. Photographs will be included on badges to prevent people from giving their badges to others who might be from the tobacco industry.

5

2.4.6

5.5.1 Control and prevention of waterpipe tobacco products: report by WHO

The use of waterpipe tobacco products is increasing globally, particularly among children and youth, due to the introduction of flavoured tobacco, its social acceptability relating to café and restaurant culture, development of mass communication and social media to promote the habit, its affordability, and the misconception that waterpipe tobacco is safer than cigarette smoking. In fact, waterpipe tobacco smoke contains disease-causing intoxicants, some of which are absorbed by the user. The WHO FCTC covers waterpipe smoking, but policies should take into account the particularities of waterpipe products, which, unlike cigarette packs, are not uniform in packaging and components. COP requested WHO to develop this report on policy options and best practices for the control of waterpipe tobacco use, and to integrate reporting on the use of waterpipes in all relevant data collection. Some suggested actions included taxation of the products, application of clean indoor air legislation to waterpipe lounges and cafés, and inclusion of warning and health labels on all the components of the product. 2.4.7 5.5.2 Electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems: report by WHO WHO prepared a report on the evidence of the health impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS), their potential role in cessation and impact on tobacco control efforts, and policy options to address these products. Based on the levels and number of toxicants produced by ENDS/ENNDS, they are likely to be less toxic than cigarettes but not harmless; long-term use is expected to increase health risks, and the exhaled aerosol is a source of contaminants that pose a health risk for bystanders. Existing longitudinal studies also indicate that ENDS/ENNDS use by minors who have never smoked at least doubles the chances that they will start smoking. There is as yet not enough evidence to indicate any positive or negative impact of ENDS/ENNDS on helping smokers quit. Some policy options suggested for Parties that have not banned ENDS/ENNDS are: taxation so the product becomes less affordable to minors; banning or restricting the amount of flavourants; prohibition of its use in indoor spaces or least where smoking is not permitted; and prevent claims about the effectiveness of ENDS/ENNDS as smoking cessation aids unless a specialized governmental agency has approved them for all Parties. Some questions raised during the discussions include the definition of ENDS use and its prevalence, and development of ISO and other standards on ENDS. Parties were encouraged to send any queries to the Convention Secretariat, 2.4.8 5.9 Tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship: depiction of tobacco in entertainment media (item proposed by a Party) The COP Secretariat prepared a report on the status of tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) in entertainment media. Depictions of tobacco use are included in the guidelines for implementation of Article 13, which state the measures that Parties should take: 1) 2) 3) 4) Certification of no benefits Prohibition of brands or imagery Requirement of anti-tobacco advertising Implementation of a ratings or classification system 6

The nature of media now, with multiple media platforms for viewing entertainment, is such that exposure to TAPS is a challenge, especially in terms of cross-border advertising entering territories where there are TAPS bans. Parties have a need to implement cross-border bans and establish proper enforcement strategies. An expert group on cross-border TAPS has been mandated to prepare a template for a protocol on this issue, and there is a working group focussing on implementation of Article 13. International cooperation is critical to addressing this challenge. 2.4.9 5.7 Implementation of Article 19 of the WHO FCTC: “Liability”: report by the expert group The expert group was directed to provide a final report on approaches that may assist Parties to strengthen civil liability mechanisms across a variety of legal systems. It was determined that the best approach would be the design of a practical toolkit that is a living online document which evolves as legal practice develops. The expert group identified three scenarios through which Parties might wish to use or strengthen their civil liability mechanisms in holding the tobacco industry to account: 1) facilitating access to justice for victims of smoking-related diseases 2) healthcare cost recovery 3) enforcing existing tobacco control measure or general laws relevant to tobacco, including injunctive relief For scenario 3, the possibility of taking action at the international level was brought up, such as in the international courts. While the toolkit that is currently being developed focuses on civil liability, enforcement of laws could involve criminal liability as well. The Convention Secretariat was requested to look into this possibility. 2.4.10 5.8 Addressing gender-specific risks when developing tobacco control strategies The Bureau was requested to include gender-specific risks as an item on the COP7 agenda, and a concept note was prepared on the issue in consultation with the International Network of Women Against Tobacco (INWAT), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UN Women, and WHO department of Gender Equity and Human Rights. While the prevalence of smoking is lower in women than in men, tobacco use by girls in some countries is increasing, and gender norms may contribute to under-reporting of use in women and girls. More women than men are exposed to secondhand smoke, and there are unique health risks for women, such as effects on fertility and pregnancy outcomes. The tobacco industry uses gender-specific tactics to target women and to make new products attractive to women. For instance, in some places waterpipe smoking is quite acceptable for women. Some potential areas for gender-specific tobacco control measures and policies include: raising taxes on tobacco products, providing gender-sensitive education efforts to empower individuals to claim smoke-free environments, issuing specific health warnings for men and women that reflect different patterns of tobacco use, providing gender-sensitive information warning about the dangers of tobacco, training health professionals in gender-specific treatment of tobacco dependence, making use of gender indicators in the collection of tobacco use data, and increasing qualitative and quantitative research in this area.

7

2.5 2.5.1

Agenda 6. Reporting, implementation assistance and international cooperation 6.1 Reporting arrangements under the WHO FCTC: report by the expert group

The expert group looked into ways in which the reporting process for Parties could be simplified and streamlined, while at the same time increase accuracy, reliability, and ease of use of the reporting instrument. The group unanimously decided to support a reporting instrument that was comprehensive; it was strongly agreed that an implementation review mechanism (IRM) under the WHO FCTC is needed to improve implementation, and that this mechanism could also facilitate provision of focussed support to Parties. The IRM should meet the following basic principles/criteria: it should be constructive and supportive for Parties, not a mechanism for criticism or rebuke; it should be transparent and objective; and it should be cost-effective. The Implementation Review Committee would consist of 15 independent experts nominated by the Parties and the Bureau, who would meet twice in between the COPs. Some comments raised during the discussion included: the composition of the review committee; budget for the expert group; whether implementation of the IRM is realistic or achievable; what assistance Parties will need to comply with reporting; and the financial implications of the reporting arrangement. 2.5.2 6.2 International cooperation for implementation of the WHO FCTC, including the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the global NCD targets and human rights The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (SGDs) includes implementation of the WHO FCTC as Target 3.a under Goal 3 on good health and well-being. Since COP6, the Convention Secretariat has actively participated in the fourth, fifth and sixth meetings of the United Nations Task Force on Prevention and Control of NCDs (UNIATF) to ensure that support for implementation of the WHO FCTC remains a key focus of the meetings. The Secretariat also proactively contributed to the development of the tobacco control element of UNIATF’s action plan. The WHO global NCD Action Plan targets a 30% relative reduction in the prevalence of tobacco use by 2025. The WHO FCTC explicitly references human rights conventions within its text; these rights are also reflected in Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women; and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Some of the links between tobacco and human rights include the issue of child labour and tobacco harvesting; the concentration of the tobacco industry in the developing world; and tobacco and protection of the environment. Furthermore, there is a growing body of evidence on the links between increased tobacco consumption, foreign investment related to the tobacco industry, and free trade. One of the strategies used by transnational tobacco companies is to enter emergingmarket economies; these have traditionally had less tobacco control regulation. An international cooperation framework has been proposed to address these issues. Definitions of the target as well as baseline were clarified with Parties. 2.5.3 6.3 South-South and Triangular cooperation

The Convention Secretariat was requested to work on the promotion of South-South cooperation in the exchange of scientific, technical and legal expertise relevant to the implementation of the FCTC. To this end, a meeting was held in Montevideo, Uruguay, in September–October 2015, attended by 8

representatives from 22 Parties from all six WHO Regions, development and UN agencies, NGO observers to the COP, knowledge hubs, and experts. Several projects were identified addressing the various objectives of the different Articles. The International Cooperation Centre for Tobacco Control (CCITC) and other knowledge hubs have been actively involved in South-South and triangular projects. A working group has also been established focussing on sustainable measures. The group requested that the Secretariat form a coordinating platform to bring together the needs identified with the providers of assistance, as well as to provide a detailed plan of action for assistance implementation. In terms of the ways forward identified, these include the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) promote implementation of Article 22 as implementation rate is currently only 41%; establish interactive communication platform with a section on assistance to Parties; convene more meetings on South-South and triangular cooperation; and continue resource mobilization strategies.

The Convention Secretariat explained about an interactive communication platform (currently under development) to facilitate discussion among Parties and the Secretariat. Once developed, the platform will be open to Parties to post questions to the Secretariat and to other Parties. 2.5.4 6.4 Sustainable measures to strengthen implementation of the WHO FCTC: report by the working group The Working Group (WG) for sustainable measures was established by COP5 in 2012 and its mandate was extended in COP6 to include strategic directions in the following core areas: mechanisms of assistance, coordination platform, national multisectoral coordination mechanisms (NMCMs), and capacity building. Mechanisms of action: It was found that the information database available to Parties was in need of updating; however, an attempt to request information met with limited success. There was fragmentation and lack of coordination in the provision of assistance. Parties were either not aware of the resources available to them or had difficult accessing these resources. Therefore, the WG determined that there is a need for a coordination platform. Coordination platform: Terms of reference have been adopted for the establishment of the platform, which should strengthen collaboration and coordination among Parties and the providers of assistance. In order not to burden the Parties and the Secretariat, this platform should utilize existing online communication mechanisms. NMCMs: In an analysis of 35 needs assessments conducted by the Secretariat, it was revealed that 80% of Parties need assistance in the area of the establishment or strengthening of NMCMs, and it is one of the most frequent requests made by Parties. The WG recommends that the Secretariat work with the UNDP and WHO to build on existing experiences and materials to develop toolkits to help Parties in this area. Capacity building: Knowledge hubs are specialised centres established by the Secretariat with certain areas of knowledge. The WG has mandated several tasks for these knowledge hubs and given them a role. These include the following: 1) Australia – Trade, tobacco and legal challenges 2) Finland – Surveillance 9

3) 4) 5) 6)

India – Smokeless tobacco use Lebanon – Waterpipe South Africa – Tobacco taxation Uruguay – International cooperation

The WG also recommends development of an action plan that would provide a long-term framework for the delivery of assistance to Parties. Such a plan of action needs to ensure coherence with all areas of work of the Secretariat; decisions on the programme and budget, and the establishment of a possible review mechanism have to be made. These should be taken up at COP7. Finally, the WG put forth a suggestion to build a strong business case that Parties can use to show the benefits of investing in tobacco control, the costs of the health burden of tobacco epidemics, and the consequences of inaction. These can serve to mobilize political will to implement tobacco control. A lunchtime seminar at COP7 will cover this issue. 2.5.5 6.5 Financial resources and mechanism of assistance

A report was made on the resources available for implementation of the workplan 2016–2017. The various mechanisms of assistance were described, including regional workshops, graphic health warnings databases for the different regions, and a tool to assess the economic impact of tobacco use and the cost of implementing the FCTC. Assistance can also be given to Parties through collaboration with other entities, such as NGOs, IGOs, and civil society. Comments focussed on the difficulty and cost of obtaining copyrighted images for the databases. The status of voluntary assessed contributions was also discussed as an important issue. The voluntary assessed contributions are used for mandatory activities in relation to the WHO FCTC. It was suggested that the term may be changed to encourage Parties’ payment. 2.5.6 6.6 Issues related to the implementation of the WHO FCTC and settlement of disputes concerning the implementation or application of the Convention A report was presented covering settlement of disputes concerning the implementation or application of the FCTC in accordance with Article 27. Some of the kinds of disputes include cross-border TAPS, illicit trade, failure to implement Article 5.3, third party action against domestic tobacco control, and undermining of domestic tobacco control efforts. Possible procedures include diplomatic channels and arbitration. While dispute settlement clauses exist in many treaties, the COP is not bound to follow these and may select those that are most applicable to the FCTC. Some issues to take into account might include: notification of disputes to other Parties and opportunities for other Parties to participate in disputes; whether proceedings should be open to the public; the role of expert evidence in the proceedings; etc. The Secretariat and Parties agreed that arbitration is the ultimate preferred approach and peaceful resolution should be pursued. 2.5.7 6.7 Trade and investment issues

Trade and investment agreements include three types: international investment agreements (IIAs), bilateral investment treaties (BITs), and treaties with investment provisions (TIPs). This report focussed on agreements that include investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), as these provide the investor with an ISDS mechanism, which tobacco companies can use to challenge national tobacco control regulation. Some features of new trade and investment agreements may add to the existing implementation challenges faced by Parties; these include: 10

1) The increased need for intersectoral coordination and cooperation between the trade/investment and health departments. 2) Lobbying activities by the tobacco industry that produce a “chilling” effect on governments, especially in developing countries. 3) Lack of financial and human resources, as well as technical capacities, making governments more vulnerable to pressure from the tobacco industry. Recently, two high-profile investment arbitrations were brought by Philip Morris regarding plain packaging legislation in Australia and Uruguay. In the first instance, the case was dismissed as “an abuse of rights” and in the latter case, it was dismissed on its merits, with frequent references to the WHO FCTC. This serves as a positive precedent that sends a signal to Parties to continue upholding the FCTC. Some policy options recommended include: 1) Improve intersectoral coordination through institutionalization of mechanisms and procedures, especially between health and trade ministries. 2) Curtail activities by the tobacco industry so as to minimize interference and influence by the industry. There should also be penal sanctions against cases of bribery and corruption. 3) Make available and increase resources, especially for developing countries. Assistance should be provided by national and international organizations with expertise, and innovative financing mechanisms and multi-stakeholder partnerships should be explored. Participants discussed the need for legal expertise in trade and tobacco control; the availability of resources at WHO Headquarters was mentioned. 2.6 2.6.1 Agenda 7. Budgetary and institutional matters 7.1 Performance report for the 2014–2015 workplan and budget

A report on activities and financial implementation for 2014–2015 was presented. No comments or questions were raised by Parties. 2.6.2 7.2 Interim performance report for the 2016–2017 workplan and budget

An interim report on activities and financial implementation for 2014–2015 was presented. No comments or questions specific to this item were raised by Parties. 2.6.3 7.3 Payment of the voluntary assessed contributions and measures to reduce Parties in arrears The Convention Secretariat presented on the status of the voluntary assessed contribution payment. Parties were asked to verify the status and look into the proposed measures to incentivise the payment. 2.6.4 7.4 Proposed workplan and budget for the financial period 2018–2019

The Convention Secretariat summarized the report on the proposed workplan and budget for 2018– 2019. The voluntary assessed contributions from each Party would be determined based on the United Nations scale of assessment for 2018–2019.

11

2.6.5

7.5 Convention Secretariat’s fund-raising efforts and collaborative work

The Convention Secretariat’s report on proposed fund-raising efforts was summarized. To date, the COP has not provided guidance on how fund-raising should be structured; this document aims to move towards adoption of a policy. The increase in the number of Parties since establishment of the FCTC has not been followed by a corresponding increase in contributions by the Parties. Furthermore, requests have increased related to new challenges in implementation. There is therefore a need to raise extrabudgetary funds. Three mechanisms are proposed: 1) Dedicated revenues for tobacco control: Revenue stemming from tobacco taxation can be earmarked for tobacco control or in support of broader health and development agendas. A suggestion was also made for Parties to channel such funds into international, bilateral or multilateral tobacco control programmes, such as for South-South and triangular cooperation. 2) International fund for tobacco control: Based on the solidarity principle, parties are suggested to voluntarily add a “micro-levy” to their existing national taxes on tobacco products, and to contribute this levy to international tobacco control activities. 3) Financing dialogue: Parties might be asked to pledge their contributions after adoption of the workplan. This mechanism is a structured way of mobilizing resources. It was noted that some Parties have attempted earmarking of taxes and often faced opposition from their treasury. Some do not have funds for tobacco control at the national level. Sustainable funding would require further work. 2.6.6 7.6 Process and methodology to conduct the performance of the Head of the Convention Secretariat The Bureau has drafted a process and methodology for performance evaluation of the Head of the Convention Secretariat and provided a matrix in Annex 1 of their report. It was noted that the current Head recused herself from discussions regarding this issue, and did not participate in any way in the preparation of this document. Questions were raised regarding how the matrix would be shared, whether Parties would be consulted, and who would be conducting the evaluation. 2.6.7 7.7 Review of accreditation of nongovernmental organizations with the status of observer to the COP The Secretariat invited 20 NGOs with observer status to submit reports via an online questionnaire, and 19 responded. In terms of activities, NGOs were most active in relation to Articles 12 and 8, and least active in Articles 15, 19, 9 and 10. The Bureau recommends that observer status be maintained for 17 of the NGOs, and that observer status be discontinued for the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations and the Medical Women’s International Association, the former for a conflict of interest and the latter due to its lack of activity. A discussion took place regarding cases of the tobacco industry mobilizing people (such as farmers) to attend the COP. Past experiences were described in which industry supporters lined up very early in the morning and obtained the badges required for entry, thus resulting in members of the public being excluded. This issue will be covered in the agenda item on maximizing transparency (see 2.6.9).

12

2.6.8 7.8 Review of accreditation of intergovernmental organizations with the status of observer to the COP A decision was made at COP6 to adopt an accreditation process for NGOs to receive and maintain observer status; however, a formal accreditation mechanism has not been adopted for IGOs. It is therefore difficult for the COP to identify contributions made by IGO observers, as well as to ensure compliance to the spirit of the Convention, or to recognize potential or actual conflicts of interest. For example, the International Labour Organization (ILO) has a long history of partnership with the tobacco industry, and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) received contributions from Philip Morris in 2015. A draft decision on the review of accreditation of IGOs was included in the report for the consideration of COP. 2.6.9 7.9 Maximizing transparency of Parties’ delegations, IGOs, NGOs and civil society groups during sessions of the COP and meetings of its subsidiary bodies This report proposes measures to maximize the transparency of participants in COP sessions and meetings of COP subsidiaries to ensure minimal interference by the tobacco industry. One measure for the consideration of COP is to adopt standard sentences in the wording of meeting invitations that specifically deny access to persons representing the tobacco industry and entities that support the industry. Another issue that requires a decision is regarding the signing of a Declaration of Interest (DOI) form confirming a participant’s non-involvement with the tobacco industry. Currently, only members of the public are required to sign the DOI. The Bureau could not come to a consensus as to whether the DOI form should be extended to the media and to governing body delegates. A question that arose was whether a declaration of conflict of interest would result in denial of entry. It was agreed that photo badges would be issued for attendees at meetings. The Bureau requests guidance from the Secretariat on whether the media should be considered as a separate category from the public. Lastly, the COP is requested to advise on whether any advanced screening procedures should be adopted for future COP sessions. 2.6.10 7.10 Possible amendments to the rules of the procedure A summary was presented of some possible amendments to the Rules of Procedure (RoP). These include: rewording that aligns RoP with current protocol; the introduction of Rule 24, which applies to the committees of the COP; amending Rule 26 to allow for flexibility in achieving a quorum; and replacement or deletion of Rules 60, 62, 63 and 64 to rectify inconsistencies with current practice. Details of these proposed amendments are in the annex of the report for COP’s consideration. No comments or questions were raised by Parties at the workshop. 2.6.11 7.11 Strengthening synergy between the Conference of Parties and the World Health Assembly Implementation of the FCTC had not been the subject of a specific stand-alone agenda item in any recent World Health Assembly until the Sixty-ninth session in May 2016. At the Sixty-eighth World Health Assembly in May 2015, Brazil, Panama, Russia and Uruguay organized a side event on strengthening synergies between the World Health Assembly and the COP. While implementation of the FCTC has been referenced in discussions on agenda items relating to the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases, information about COP decisions has not been systematically shared with the World Health Assembly. Making the implementation of the FCTC a priority and strengthening synergy between the World Health Assembly and COP would be complementary to both entities. No comments or questions were raised by Parties at the workshop. 13

2.6.12 7.12 Relationship of the Convention Secretariat with other international entities This draft proposal is for the Secretariat to consider becoming an observer to other governing bodies that have overlapping or complementary areas of work. Benefits from this relationship include the opportunity to raise awareness about issues related to the FCTC during informal discussions, to make interventions if allowed, and to gain access to relevant documentation. Annex 1 of the report contains a table listing the organizations, the category of their observers, their current relationship with the Secretariat, and key areas of overlap with the FCTC and the Secretariat. It was noted that decisions to engage with an organization must take into account Article 5.3, which could constitute a reason that relationship with a particular organization is not pursued. Annex 2 in the report lists 12 organizations for consideration. The Secretariat is requested to initiate discussions with the secretariats of these entities regarding an application for observer status. No comments or questions were raised by Parties at the workshop. 2.6.13 7.13 Hosting arrangements between the Convention Secretariat and WHO This document addresses the limited amount of guidance available thus far on the hosting arrangements between the Secretariat and WHO. Both entities recognize that this is a complex situation and that the lack of clarity has resulted in ad hoc arrangements and financial implications. A management review commissioned by WHO and conducted by an independent contractor determined that the absence of a formalised agreement was a significant impediment to the efficiency of the Secretariat. Therefore, the Secretariat has put forth the following as key elements of a future hosting arrangement: 1) The level of visibility of the Secretariat and its status within the WHO structure should be enhanced. 2) There should be a level of administrative authority for the Secretariat and clarity regarding engagement with WHO Headquarters and regional and country offices, as well as a level of administrative support. 3) Financial management arrangements should be clarified, including the terms surrounding Programme Support Charges (PSC) and other charges. 4) There should be recognition of the Secretariat’s mandate to take the lead on treaty matters. It was noted that currently all revenues generated by the Secretariat, as well as the voluntary assessed contributions from Parties, are subject to the 13% PSC by WHO. However, at the same time the Secretariat is also charged for various services. WHO is in the process of reviewing their cost recovery method, and it would therefore be reasonable to wait until decisions have been made on this issue before financial management arrangements are finalized. These key elements will be presented at COP7, and actual hosting arrangements will be decided upon during COP8. No comments or questions were raised by Parties at the workshop. 2.7 Agenda 8. Date and place of the 8th session of the COP

The 8th session of the COP will take place in Geneva, Switzerland. Options for dates were presented for Parties’ consideration. 2.8 Nominations for Elected Officials

Ms Jackie Davis presented a summary of the nominations for elected officials. 14

3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

3.1 Conclusions The workshop successfully addressed all the agenda items of the COP7 to help participants gain better understanding of each item. Key main concerns and issues related to the technical aspects of the agenda items raised by the Parties include the following: 1) The self-reported information in the global progress report needs to be reviewed to improve quality and accuracy. Parties in general welcomed the idea of an experts group’s report and the idea of setting up review committees. Some Parties shared experience of civil society’s participation in the reporting process. WHO’s regional and country offices stand ready to support Parties in this effort together with the Convention Secretariat. 2) Many Parties have successfully increased their efforts to implement Article 5.3 on tobacco industry interference. However, these efforts must be intensified. Case studies, practical best practices and lessons learned on how to implement Article 5.3 may be helpful. 3) While the Convention Secretariat has endeavoured to provide capacity building for the ratification of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade, the tobacco industry is also reaching out to the different economic-trade platforms such as ASEAN. As of now, Mongolia is the only Party in the Region that has signed the Protocol. Others Parties of the WHO FCTC are urged to become Parties to the Protocol. 4) Types of tobacco products are evolving and the popularity of emerging tobacco products such as heat-not-burn tobacco are increasing. Stronger position and clear guidance should be given to the Parties by the COP. 5) Definition of tobacco free products including non-nicotine is required. All the existing legislation covers “tobacco”; however, the legality of non-tobacco products is not clear. 6) Banning waterpipe tobacco products such as shisha requires cooperation across other sectors. More information/data is needed on waterpipe regulation among countries. 7) Strong evidence on the benefits of using e-cigarette for smoking cessation purpose is still limited. 8) Guidelines for dealing with liability issues may be limited in terms of the feasibility of the implementation due to country context. Case studies with practical recommendations might be more appropriate for knowledge sharing. 9) Gender difference in tobacco epidemic is observed in many countries. Increased efforts to document gender-sensitive approaches in tobacco control will support knowledge sharing among the Parties. 10) Legislation on cross-border and internet tobacco advertisement ban is yet to be developed across Parties. Practical tools and mechanisms may be required. 11) In relation to trade agreement, the ministry of health should take part during the course of the negotiations as some aspects of the trade agreement may undermine public health policies, including those on tobacco control. 12) Importance of voluntary assessed contribution should be emphasized to improve the collection rate. Some Parties in the meeting proposed to remove the word “voluntary” to better reflect the obligatory nature of the contribution.

15

13) Country-specific concerns, questions and comments include: (a) Australia • For implementation of Article 5.3, pointed out that from a policy perspective, it is useful and practical for the toolkit to include guidelines from other countries so that there is a platform for exchange of information. • Raised concern that it is difficult to legislate Internet advertisement ban due to crossborder issues; request was made for practical tools and mechanisms to address this. • Raised the point that trade agreements should be negotiated such that the other public health policy protections are not undermined. • Pointed out that treasury does not usually support funding related to tobacco taxation. (b) China • Raised the question of what is a prevention strategy for e-cigarettes. • Raised concern about increasing female smoking prevalence, which may not be accurately reported in the national data; secondhand smoke among females is also high. Requested that countries share their experiences with successful programmes or campaigns targeting young women. • Raised concern that the definition of “tobacco advertising” may not include ecigarettes. (c) Japan • Raised concern over the increasing popularity of heat-not-burn tobacco, which should be discussed for future consideration. • Raised concern that although female smoking prevalence is generally low, in some segments such as young mothers and working women, the prevalence is high. (d) Malaysia • Raised the question of whether shisha is considered tobacco. • Raised a question regarding ENDS—if ENDS is considered a tobacco product, then what is the definition of smoking prevalence? Are there different definitions for smoking versus vapouring? (e) Mongolia • Raised concern that while one law banned indoor smoking, one parliamentarian introduced new law allowing indoor smoking. Request was made for WHO FCTC to submit recommendations or comments to parliaments to negotiate this kind of law. (f) New Zealand • Raised a concern about how to distinguish regional NGOs from national/subnational ones for eligibility as an observer to the COP. • For the Global Progress Report, nominated two people from civil society to answer questions independently from the Ministry of Health; recommended that members of civil society be given the chance to provide input on the report. • For implementation of Article 5.3, requested that the tools and knowledge hub provided by the Secretariat to assist Parties also include case studies and examples from different countries. • Inquired whether the public is excluded from attending COP or if they are allowed to attend certain sessions. • Welcomed future work on addictiveness reduction; pointed out that reducing smoking is important not just in terms of reducing nicotine levels. • Regarding e-cigarettes containing nicotine, raised the concern that people can easily buy these from the Internet so a ban would not be effective. • Raised the point that in order to enforce smoke-free regulations, the products regulated should include both those that contain nicotine and those that have nicotine derived from tobacco.

16

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

Raised concern about female smoking prevalence especially among indigenous people, for example, the rate is over 40% in the Maori; therefore, gender-specific guidance is important. • Raised concern that product advertisements are not easily regulated on the Internet and asked what tools can be used to overcome this issue? • Raised the issue of copyright of graphic health warnings. A process is under review for clearing the copyrights and including images in a database. Other Parties are encouraged to contribute to the database. • Pointed out that trade agreements that came from negotiations with the public health sector are useful as they apply to tobacco, alcohol, and other public health issues. • Pointed out that treasury does not usually support funding related to tobacco taxation. Philippines • For implementation of Article 5.3, recommended collaboration and partnership with international organizations and civil service commission. Republic of Korea • For the Global Progress Report, Ministry of Health and Welfare asked experts to review the report before submission to the Secretariat, which improved the quality and accuracy of the self-report. • Regarding ENDS, pointed out that users are attracted by the flavours; recommended focusing on control of flavours. • Raised the concern that there is confusion among tobacco control researchers because come countries promote ENDS as an alternative to tobacco and some do not. More time is required to observe the health effect of e-cigarettes. In Korea, the Ministry of Health has declared that e-cigarettes are harmful. • Described the lawsuits brought by the government on tobacco companies, which are expected to go on for 10 years; tobacco companies have “litigation prevention programmes” where they educate lawyers on how to overcome lawsuits. • Raised concern about female smoking prevalence, which is not accurately reported in the national data due to the taboo on female smoking in the culture. Singapore • Requested clarification in regards to the implementation of Articles 9 and 10—what is the scope of the items listed in paragraphs 28 and 30? Do they fall under ENDS? Does apparatus fall outside the scope of the Parties? • Raised a question about whether tobacco-free products only include those that are non-nicotine; existing legislation covers “tobacco,” but the legality of non-tobacco products is unclear. • Regarding control and prevention of waterpipe products, raised the question of why there is no specific mention of banning or regulation of these products. • Pointed out that cooperation with other sectors is necessary in order to ban waterpipes such as shisha, as there are cross-border trade issues that have to be resolved. • Regarding Article 19, raised concern that guidelines may be restrictive in terms of their feasibility in implementation; resources with practical recommendations may be more helpful instead. • Pointed out that in Singapore, ENDS are regarded as imitations of tobacco products; therefore, advertising of ENDS is banned. • Requested resource from WHO FCTC to work on trade issues. Viet Nam • Raised concern that graphic health warnings are only implemented in the urban areas of the country. • Raised concern over the increasing popularity of waterpipe tobacco products. •

17

Recommendations 3.1.1 Recommendations for Member States 1) 2) 3) 4) 3.2.2 Parties are encouraged to prepare a joint statement to highlight regional progress in the implementation of WHO FCTC. Parties are encouraged to specify types of support they would require to accelerate the implementation of the WHO FCTC. Parties are encouraged to further pursue full implementation of the Article 5.3 guidelines. Parties are encouraged to share existing resources (e.g. case studies and tools) through the Convention Secretariat to assist other Parties in need.

Recommendation for WHO Secretariat 1) Provide support to Parties, as appropriate, in preparing their participation at the COP7.

3.3.3

Recommendations for the Convention Secretariat 1) The Convention Secretariat is committed to support Parties upon request, working closely with WHO regional and country offices. 2) While submitting periodic reporting is a treaty obligation for the Parties, increased submission of the report by Parties should also be sought further by the Convention Secretariat. 3) Convention Secretariat was also requested to share relevant information with the responsible officer to facilitate the Pre COP7 meeting in Fiji.

18

Annex 1. List of Participants

1. PARTICIPANTS Ms Jackie DAVIS, Assistant Secretary, Tobacco Control Branch, Australian Government, Department of Health, Central Office, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, Telephone: +61 2 6289 8771, Facsimile: +61 2 6289 7837, E-mail: Jackie.Davis@health.gov.au Dr SIN Sovann, Deputy Director, National Center for Health Promotion, Ministry of Health, No. 3, National Road 6A, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Telephone: +855 1295 7647, E-mail: sovann@nchp.gov.kh Mr SUN Xiaofei, Deputy Director, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, No. 2 Chaoyangmen South Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China, Telephone: +86 10 6596 3218, E-mail: Sun_xiaofei@mfa.gov.cn Mr HUANG Chen, Attaché, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, No. 2 Chaoyangmen South Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China, Telephone: +86 10 6596 3218, E-mail: huang_chen@mfa.gov.cn Dr JIANG Yuan, Deputy Director, Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease control and Prevention, 27 Nan Wei Road, Beijing 100050, China, Telephone: +86 10 8316 1028 E-mail: jiangyuan@vip.sina.com Dr Itsuro YOSHIMI, Tobacco Control Initiative Officer, Cancer Control and Health Promotion Division, Health Service Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 1-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8916, Japan, E-mail: yoshimi-itsurou@mhlw.go.jp Dr Chandavone PHOXAY, Deputy Director, Department of Hygiene – Health Promotion, Ministry of Health, Ban thatkhao Sisattanack District, Rue Simeuang, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Telephone: +856 21 214010, Facsimile: +856 21 285270 E-mail: chandavone.phoxay@yahoo.com Dr Noraryana HASSAN, Senior Principal Assistant Director, Tobacco Control Unit & FCTC Secretariat, Disease Control Division (NCD), Ministry of Health Malaysia, 2nd Floor Block E3 Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan, 62590 Putrajaya, Malaysia, Telephone: +60 12 257 9006 Facsimile: +60 38 892 4530, E-mail: noraryana@gmail.com Dr Baigalmaa DANGAA, Senior Officer for Policy Coordination, Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control, Public Health Division, Health Policy Coordination Department, Ministry of Health and Sport, Government Building-8, Olympic Street-2, Sukhbaatar District, Ulaanbaatar 14210, Mongolia, Telephone: +976 9915 3926, E-mail: baigalmad@yahoo.com Mr Brendon BAKER, Senior Adviser, Tobacco Control, Ministry of Health, No. 1 The Terrace, Wellington 6011, New Zealand, Telephone: +64 4 816 3930, E-mail: brendon_baker@moh.govt.nz Dr Maria Elizabeth CALUAG, Medical Officer and Division Chief, Disease Prevention and Control Bureau, Lifestyle-Related Disease Division, Department of Health, No. 3, San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Santa Cruz, Manila, Philippines, Telephone: +632 651 7800, E-mail: elizabethcaluag@yahoo.com

19

Dr Ma. Cristina GALANG, Medical Specialist IV, Disease Prevention and Control Bureau, LifestyleRelated Diseases Division, Department of Health, No. 3, San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Santa Cruz, Manila, Philippines, Telephone: +63 927 312 2457 E-mail: mcp_doh@yahoo.com Dr Nancy U. SOLIS, Medical Officer III, Office of the Secretary, Department of Health, No. 3, San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Santa Cruz, Manila, Philippines, Telephone: +63 651 7800 E-mail: empressnicole43@yahoo.com Ms Socorro BALBINO, Supervising Health Program Officer, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, Department of Health, No. 3, San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Santa Cruz, Manila, Philippines, Telephone: +63 928 287 5163, E-mail: sbalbino.bihc@gmail.com Ms Abigail D. LIBRE, Project Manager, Civil Service Commission, The Union Project, Constitution Hills, Batasang Pambansa Complex, Diliman 1126, Quezon City, Philippines, Telephone: +63 915 387 0972, E-mail: tobaccocontrolpm@csc.gov.ph, abigaillibre@yahoo.com Dr Sungkyu LEE, Senior Researcher, National Evidence-Based ,Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), 7th Floor, Namsan Square, 173 Toegy-ro, Jung-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Telephone: +82 2 2174 2770, Facsimile: +82 2 747 4918, E-mail: wwwvince77@gmail.com Ms Chee Yeong CHNG, Senior Deputy Director, Substance Abuse, Preventive Health Programmes Division, Health Promotion Board, 3 Second Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168937, Singapore, Telephone: +65 6435 3705, E-mail: chng_chee_yeong@hpb.gov.sg Mr Lit Fai CHAN, Manager, Substance Abuse, Adult Health Division, Health Promotion Board, 3 Second Hospital Avenue , Singapore 168937, Singapore, Telephone: +65 6435 3177, E-mail: chan_lit_fai@hpb.gov.sg Mr Benjamin LEE, Senior Manager, Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health, College of Medicine Building, 16 College Road, Singapore 169854, Singapore Telephone: +65 6325 9036, Facsimile: +65 6221 7554, E-mail: Benjamin_lee@moh.gov.sg Ms DOAN Thi Thu Huyen, M&E Officer, Vietnam Tobacco Control Fund, Ministry of Health , 5th Floor, Toserco Building, 273 Kim Ma Street, Ba Dinh District, Hanoi, Viet Nam, Telephone: +84 43 831 4909, Facsimile: +84 43 831 5440, E-mail: huyen.vinacosh@gmail.com

2. TEMPORARY ADVISER Dr Mary Assunta KOLANDAI, Senior Policy Advisor, Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance, Level 14, 477 Pitt Street, Sydney 2000 NSW, Australia, Telephone: +61 2 8063 411 E-mail: mary.assunta@cancer.org.au

3. OBSERVERS

Atty Deborah SY, Legal Adviser, (International intergovernmental organization (IGO) accredited as observer to the COP), South Centre, 6th Floor Victoria I Building, 1670 Quezon Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines, Telephone: (+632) 709 6503n, E-mail: debbyksy@gmail.com

20

Atty Irene N. REYES, (Nongovernmental organizations accredited as observers to the COP), Legal Adviser and Regional Coordinator, Western Pacific Region, Corporate Accountability International 6th Floor, Victoria I Building, 1670 Quezon Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines Telephone: +63 939 937 7257, E-mail: ipnreyes@gmail.com Dr Maria Encarnita LIMPIN, Executive Director, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Alliance Philippines, (member of the Framework Convention Alliance), 81-C K-2nd Street, Kamuning, Quezon City, 1103, Philippines, Telephone: +632 441-4383 E-mail: ecblmd2012@gmail.com Dr Domilyn C. VILLARREIZ, Smoke-free Program Manager, Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance, WPR Regional Coordinator, Framework Convention Alliance, 83 Amethyst Street, Gem Village, Ma-a, Davao City 8000, Philippines, Telephone: +63 920 921 3664 Facsimile: +66 2 668 3650, E-mail: domilyn@seatca.org Ms Michelle Syonne REYES-PALMONES, Technical Advisor – Philippines, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), 8 Randolph Crescent, Edinburgh EH37TH Scotland, United Kingdom, Telephone: +63 917 795 9934, E-mail: mreyespalmones@theunion.org Mr Wendell BALDERAS, Media and Communications Officer, Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA), Thakolsuk Place, Ranong 2, Bangkok, Thailand, E-mail: wendell@seatca.org Dr Ulysses DOROTHEO, Project Director, Southeast Asia Initiative for Tobacco Tax (SITT Project) Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA), 4548 Clover Road , Sun Valley Subdivision, Parañaque City, Philippines, Telephone: +63 917 886 2020, E-mail: ulysses@seatca.org Ms Jennie Lyn C. REYES-PEORO, Monitoring and Evaluation Manager, Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA), Thakolsuk Place, Ranong 2, Bangkok, Thailand Telephone: +63 928 508 3109, E-mail: jennie@seatca.org

4. SECRETARIAT Dr Susan MERCADO, Director, Division of NCD and Health Through the Life-Course, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines Telephone: +63 2 528 9980, Facsimile: +63 2 521 1036, E-mail: mercados@who.int Dr Katia DE PINHO CAMPOS (Responsible Officer), Acting Coordinator, Tobacco Free Initiative WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines, Telephone: 63 2 528 9870, Facsimile: 63 2 521 1036, Email: depinhocamposk@who.int Ms Mina KASHIWABARA, Technical Officer, Tobacco Free Initiative , WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines Telephone: +63 2 528 9894, Facsimile: +63 2 521 1036, E-mail: kashiwabaram@who.int Dr Ki-Hyun HAHM, Technical Officer, (Legislation and Regulation), Division of Health Sector Development, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines, Telephone: +63 2 528 9826, Facsimile: +63 2 521 1036, E-mail: hahmk@who.int Ms Mary Jocelyn ALAMPAY, Consultant, Tobacco Free Initiative, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines, Telephone: +63 2 528 9894, Facsimile: +63 2 521 1036, E-mail:alampaym@wpro.who.int

21

Ms Anna KRISTENSEN-ALVAREZ, Intern, Tobacco Free Initiative, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines, Telephone: +63 2 528 8001, Facsimile: +63 2 521 1036, E-mail: kristensenalvareza@who.int Ms Emiri SUZUKI, Intern, Division of Health Sector Development, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines Telephone: +63 2 528 8001, Facsimile: +63 2 521 1036, E-mail: suzukie@who.int Dr LIU Guangyuan, Team Leader, Governance, Convention Secretariat, WHO FCTC, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland, Telephone: +41 22 791 1514, Email: liug@who.int

22

Annex 2. Programme of Activities

Day 1, Thursday 15 September 08:30–09:00 09:00–09:15 Registration Welcome and opening remarks Dr Susan Mercado Director, DNH, WHO/WPRO Dr Vera Luiza da Costa e Silva Head, The Convention Secretariat Dr Katia de Pinho Campos Technical Officer, Acting Coordinator for TFI

09:15-09:25 09:25–09:35

Welcome message (video) Introduction of participants Announcement of office bearers Administrative announcements

09:35–10:00 10:00–10:10 10:10–10:20

Group photo and healthy break Confirmation of workshop structure Overview of COP7 arrangement and programme of work Agenda 2. Applications for the status of observer to the Conference of the Parties Document FCTC/COP/7/3 Agenda 4. Global progress report in implementation of the WHO FCTC, followed by a general debate Document FCTC/COP/7/4 Agenda 5. Treaty instruments and technical matters 5.1. Status of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products Document FCTC/COP/7/5 5.2. Impact assessment of the WHO FCTC: report by the expert group Document FCTC/COP/7/6 5.4. Further development of the partial guidelines for implementation of Articles 9 and 10: report by the working group and report by WHO Documents FCTC/COP/7/8; FCTC/COP/7/9; FCTC/COP/7/INF.DOC/1 5.6. Economically sustainable alternatives to tobacco growing (in relation to Articles 17 and 18 of the WHO FCTC) Document FCTC/COP/7/12 23 Ms Mina Kashiwabara Technical Officer, TFI Ms Guangyuan Liu The Convention Secretariat Moderator: Dr Katia de Pinho Campos Moderator: Dr Katia de Pinho Campos

10:20–10:35

10:35–10:50

10:50–12:05

10:50-11:20

Moderator: Ms Jackie Davis Assistant Secretary, Tobacco Control Branch, Australian Government Department of Health Central Office

11:20-11:35

11:35-11:50

11:50-12:05

12:05-12:15 12:15–13:00 13:00–15:00

Nominations for Elected Officials Lunch Agenda 5. Treaty instruments and technical matters (continued) 5.3. Implementation of Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC Document FCTC/COP/7/7 5.5.1. Control and prevention of waterpipe tobacco products: report by WHO Document FCTC/COP/7/10 5.5.2. Electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems: report by WHO Document FCTC/COP/7/11 5.9. Tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship: depiction of tobacco in entertainment media (item proposed by a Party) Document FCTC/COP/7/38 Healthy break Agenda 5. Treaty instruments and technical matters (continued) 5.7. Implementation of Article 19 of the WHO FCTC: “Liability”: report by the expert group Document FCTC/COP/7/13 5.8. Addressing gender-specific risks when developing tobacco control strategies Document FCTC/COP/7/14 Agenda 6. Reporting, implementation assistance and international cooperation 6.1. Reporting arrangements under the WHO FCTC: report by the expert group Document FCTC/COP/7/15 6.2. International cooperation for implementation of the WHO FCTC, including the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the global NCD targets and human rights. Document FCTC/COP/7/16 Wrap-up of day 1 24

Moderator: Ms Jackie Davis

Moderator: Ms Jackie Davis

13:00-13:30

13:30-14:00

14:00-14:30

14:30-15:00

15:00–15:15 15:15–16:00

Moderator: Dr Ki-Hyun Hahm

15:15-15:30

15:30-16:00

16:00-16:45

Moderator: Ms Guangyuan Liu

16:00-16:15

16:15-16:45

16:45–17:00

Rapporteur

17:30–19:00

Welcome reception

Day 2, Friday 16 September 08:30-8:45 08:45–10:15 Recap of Day 1 and Objectives of Day 2 Agenda 6. Reporting, implementation assistance and international cooperation (continued) 6.3. South-South and Triangular cooperation Document FCTC/COP/7/17 6.4. Sustainable measures to strengthen implementation of the WHO FCTC: report by the working group Document FCTC/COP/7/18 6.5. Financial resources and mechanism of assistance Document FCTC/COP/7/19 6.6. Issues related to the implementation of the WHO FCTC and settlement of disputes concerning the implementation or application of the Convention Document FCTC/COP/7/20 Healthy break Agenda 6. Reporting, implementation assistance and international cooperation (continued) 6.7. Trade and investment issues Document FCTC/COP/7/21 10:45–12:00 10:45–10:55 Agenda 7. Budgetary and institutional matters 7.1. Performance report for the 2014–2015 workplan and budget Document FCTC/COP/7/22 7.2. Interim performance report for the 2016–2017 workplan and budget Document FCTC/COP/7/23 7.3. Payment of the voluntary assessed contributions and measures to reduce Parties in arrears Document FCTC/COP/7/24 7.4. Proposed workplan and budget for the financial period 2018–2019 Documents FCTC/COP/7/25; FCTC/COP/7/INF.DOC./2 25 Moderator: Ms Guangyuan Liu Moderator: Dr Ki-Hyun Hahm Moderator: Dr Ki-Hyun Hahm Ms Mina Kashiwabara Moderator: Ms Guangyuan Liu

08:45-09:00

09:00-09:15

09:15-09:30

09:30-10:00

10:00–10:15 10:15-10:45

10:55–11:05

11:05–11:20

11:20–11:45

11:45–13:30 12:00–13:00

Lunch Brown Bag session: Launch of Tobacco Industry Interference Index Agenda 7. Budgetary and institutional matters (continued) 7.5. Convention Secretariat’s fund-raising efforts and collaborative work Document FCTC/COP/7/26 7.6. Process and methodology to conduct the performance of the Head of the Convention Secretariat Document FCTC/COP/7/27 7.7. Review of accreditation of nongovernmental organizations with the status of observers to the Conference of the Parties Document FCTC/COP/7/28 7.8. Review of accreditation of intergovernmental organizations with the status of observer to the COP Document FCTC/COP/7/29 7.9. Maximizing transparency of Parties’ delegations, IGOs, NGOs and civil society groups during sessions of the COP and meetings of its subsidiary bodies Document FCTC/COP/7/30 7.10. Possible amendments to the rules of procedure Document FCTC/COP/7/31 7.11. Strengthening synergy between the Conference of Parties and the World Health Assembly Document FCTC/COP/7/32 Healthy break Agenda 7. Budgetary and institutional matters (continued) 7.12. Relationship of the Convention Secretariat with other international entities Document FCTC/COP/7/33 7.13. Hosting arrangements between the Convention Secretariat and WHO Document FCTC/COP/7/34 Moderator: Ms Guangyuan Liu Moderator: Dr Katia de Pinho Campos

13:30–15:00

13:30-13:45

13:45-14:00

14:00-14:15

14:15-14:30

14:30-14:45

14:45-15:00

15:00-15:15

15:15–15:30 15:30–16:00

15:30-15:45

15:45-16:00

26

16:00-16:10

Agenda 8. Date and place of the eight session of the COP Document FCTC/COP/7/35 Nominations for Elected Officials (follow-up of Day 1) Wrap-up of day 2 Closing remarks

Moderator: Ms Guangyuan Liu

16:10-16:20 16:20-16:35 16:35–16:45

Moderator: Ms Jackie Davis Rapporteur Dr Susan Mercado Director, DNH, WHO/WPRO

27

www.wpro.who.int