Statement by the Delegation of Armenia on the United Nations International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists, observed on 2 November
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In determining the return to be expected from the investment of a sum awarded as damages for future pecuniary loss in an action for personal injury the court shall, subject to and in accordance with rules of court made for the purposes of this section, take into account such rate of return (if any) as may from time to time be prescribed by an order made by the Lord Chancellor.
Subsection (1) above shall not however prevent the court taking a different rate of return into account if any party to the proceedings shows that it is more appropriate in the case in question.
An order under subsection (1) above may prescribe different rates of return for different classes of case.
Before making an order under subsection (1) above the Lord Chancellor shall consult the Government Actuary and the Treasury; and any order under that subsection shall be made by statutory instrument subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
In the application of this section to Scotland for references to the Lord Chancellor there shall be substituted references to the Secretary of State.
In determining the return to be expected from the investment of a sum awarded as damages for future pecuniary loss in an action for personal injury the court must, subject to and in accordance with rules of court made for the purposes of this section, take into account such rate of return (if any) as may from time to time be prescribed by an order made by the Lord Chancellor.
Subsection (1) does not however prevent the court taking a different rate of return into account if any party to the proceedings shows that it is more appropriate in the case in question.
An order under subsection (1) may prescribe different rates of return for different classes of case.
An order under subsection (1) may in particular distinguish between classes of case by reference to—
the description of future pecuniary loss involved;
the length of the period during which future pecuniary loss is expected to occur;
the time when future pecuniary loss is expected to occur.
Schedule A1 (which makes provision about determining the rate of return to be prescribed by an order under subsection (1)) has effect.
An order under this section is to be made by statutory instrument subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
A court awarding damages for future pecuniary loss in respect of personal injury—
may order that the damages are wholly or partly to take the form of periodical payments, and
shall consider whether to make that order.
In cases where Regulation (EC) No. 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2007 on rail passengers’ rights and obligations applies, this section needs to be read in the light of Article 30 of the Uniform Rules concerning the contract for the international carriage of passengers and luggage by rail (damages to be awarded as annuity on request), as set out in Annex I to that Regulation.
A court awarding other damages in respect of personal injury may, if the parties consent, order that the damages are wholly or partly to take the form of periodical payments.
A court may not make an order for periodical payments unless satisfied that the continuity of payment under the order is reasonably secure.
For the purpose of subsection (3) the continuity of payment under an order is reasonably secure if—
it is protected by a guarantee given under section 6 of or Schedule 1 to this Act,
it is protected by a scheme under section 213 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (compensation) (whether or not as modified by section 4 of this Act), or
the source of payment is a government or health service body.
An order for periodical payments may include provision—
requiring the party responsible for the payments to use a method (selected or to be selected by him) under which the continuity of payment is reasonably secure by virtue of subsection (4);
about how the payments are to be made, if not by a method under which the continuity of payment is reasonably secure by virtue of subsection (4);
requiring the party responsible for the payments to take specified action to secure continuity of payment, where continuity is not reasonably secure by virtue of subsection (4);
enabling a party to apply for a variation of provision included under paragraph (a), (b) or (c).
Where a person has a right to receive payments under an order for periodical payments, or where an arrangement is entered into in satisfaction of an order which gives a person a right to receive periodical payments, that person’s right under the order or arrangement may not be assigned or charged without the approval of the court which made the order; and—
a court shall not approve an assignment or charge unless satisfied that special circumstances make it necessary, and
a purported assignment or charge, or agreement to assign or charge, is void unless approved by the court.
Where an order is made for periodical payments, an alteration of the method by which the payments are made shall be treated as a breach of the order (whether or not the method was specified under subsection (5)(b)) unless—
the court which made the order declares its satisfaction that the continuity of payment under the new method is reasonably secure,
the new method is protected by a guarantee given under section 6 of or Schedule 1 to this Act,
the new method is protected by a scheme under section 213 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (compensation) (whether or not as modified by section 4 of this Act), or
the source of payment under the new method is a government or health service body.
An order for periodical payments shall be treated as providing for the amount of payments to vary by reference to the retail prices index (within the meaning of section 833(2) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988) at such times, and in such a manner, as may be determined by or in accordance with Civil Procedure Rules.
But an order for periodical payments may include provision—
disapplying subsection (8), or
modifying the effect of subsection (8).
In determining the return to be expected from the investment of a sum awarded as damages for future pecuniary loss in an action for personal injury, a court must take into account the rate of return set by the official rate-assessor.
However—
the court is to do so subject to and in accordance with rules of court (if any) made for the purpose of subsection (1),
the court may take a different rate of return into account if a party to the action shows that the different rate is more appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
Schedule B1 contains provision about setting the rate of return for the purpose of subsection (1).
In subsection (1), the reference to the official rate-assessor is to—
if no regulations under paragraph (b) are in force, the Government Actuary (but, when that office is vacant, the Deputy Government Actuary), or
a person appointed in place of the Government Actuary (including the Deputy as referred to in paragraph (a)) by regulations made by the Scottish Ministers.
Regulations under subsection (4)(b) may provide for a person to deputise for the person appointed in place of the Government Actuary.
Before making regulations under subsection (4)(b), the Scottish Ministers must obtain the agreement of—
as respects appointment in place of the Government Actuary, the person to be appointed,
as respects deputising as mentioned in subsection (5), the person who is to deputise as provided for.
Regulations under subsection (4)(b) are subject to the affirmative procedure.
This section applies where a person—
is awarded provisional damages; and
subsequently dies as a result of the act or omission which gave rise to the cause of action for which the damages were awarded.
The award of the provisional damages shall not operate as a bar to an action in respect of that person’s death under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976.
Such part (if any) of— as was intended to compensate him for pecuniary loss in a period which in the event falls after his death shall be taken into account in assessing the amount of any loss of support suffered by the person or persons for whose benefit the action under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 is brought.
the provisional damages; and
any further damages awarded to the person in question before his death,
No award of further damages made in respect of that person after his death shall include any amount for loss of income in respect of any period after his death.
In this section “provisional damages” means damages awarded by virtue of subsection (2)(a) of section 32A of the Senior Courts Act 1981 or section 51 of the County Courts Act 1984 and “further damages” means damages awarded by virtue of subsection (2)(b) of either of those sections.
Subsection (2) above applies whether the award of provisional damages was before or after the coming into force of that subsection; and subsections (3) and (4) apply to any award of damages under the 1976 Act or, as the case may be, further damages after the coming into force of those subsections.
In the application of this section to Northern Ireland—
for references to the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 there shall be substituted references to the Fatal Accidents (Northern Ireland) Order 1977;
for the reference to subsection (2)(a) and (b) of section 32A of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and section 51 of the County Courts Act 1984 there shall be substituted a reference to paragraph 10(2)(a) and (b) of Schedule 6 to the Administration of Justice Act 1982.
In determining the return to be expected from the investment of a sum awarded as damages for future pecuniary loss in an action for personal injury the court must, subject to and in accordance with rules of court made for the purposes of this section, take into account the rate of return set by the official rate-assessor.
Subsection (1) does not however prevent the court from taking a different rate of return into account if any party to the action shows that the different rate is more appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
Schedule C1 (which makes provision about setting the rate of return for the purpose of subsection (1)) has effect.
In subsection (1), the reference to the official rate-assessor is to—
if no regulations under paragraph (b) are in force, the Government Actuary (but, when that office is vacant, the Deputy Government Actuary), or
a person appointed in place of the Government Actuary (including the Deputy as referred to in paragraph (a)) by regulations made by the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland.
Regulations under subsection (4)(b) may provide for a person to deputise for the person appointed in place of the Government Actuary.
Before making regulations under subsection (4)(b), the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland must obtain the agreement of—
as respects appointment in place of the Government Actuary, the person to be appointed,
as respects deputising as mentioned in subsection (5), the person who is to deputise as provided for.
The power to make regulations under subsection (4)(b) is exercisable by statutory rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979.
Regulations under subsection (4)(b) may not be made unless a draft of the regulations has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, the Assembly.
Subsection (2) applies where—
a person has a right to receive periodical payments, and
his right is protected by a scheme under section 213 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (compensation), but only as to part of the payments.
The protection provided by the scheme shall extend by virtue of this section to the whole of the payments.
Subsection (4) applies where—
one person (“the claimant”) has a right to receive periodical payments from another person (“the defendant”),
a third person (“the insurer”) is required by or in pursuance of an arrangement entered into with the defendant (whether or not together with other persons and whether before or after the creation of the claimant’s right) to make payments in satisfaction of the claimant’s right or for the purpose of enabling it to be satisfied, and
the claimant’s right to receive the payments would be wholly or partly protected by a scheme under section 213 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 if it arose from an arrangement of the same kind as that mentioned in paragraph (b) but made between the claimant and the insurer.
For the purposes of the scheme under section 213 of that Act—
the claimant shall be treated as having a right to receive the payments from the insurer under an arrangement of the same kind as that mentioned in subsection (3)(b),
the protection under the scheme in respect of those payments shall extend by virtue of this section to the whole of the payments, and
no person other than the claimant shall be entitled to protection under the scheme in respect of the payments.
In this section “periodical payments” means periodical payments made pursuant to—
an order of a court in so far as it is made in reliance on section 2 above (including an order as varied), or
an agreement in so far as it settles a claim or action for damages in respect of personal injury (including an agreement as varied).
In subsection (5)(b) the reference to an agreement in so far as it settles a claim or action for damages in respect of personal injury includes a reference to an undertaking given by the Motor Insurers' Bureau (being the company of that name incorporated on 14th June 1946 under the Companies Act 1929), or an Article 75 insurer under the Bureau’s Articles of Association, in relation to a claim or action in respect of personal injury.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In section 4 above a “structured settlement” means an agreement settling a claim or action for damages for personal injury on terms whereby—
the damages are to consist wholly or partly of periodical payments; and
the person to whom the payments are to be made is to receive them as the annuitant under one or more annuities purchased for him by the person against whom the claim or action is brought or, if he is insured against the claim, by his insurer.
The periodical payments may be for the life of the claimant, for a specified period or of a specified number or minimum number or include payments of more than one of those descriptions.
The amounts of the periodical payments (which need not be at a uniform rate or payable at uniform intervals) may be—
specified in the agreement, with or without provision for increases of specified amounts or percentages; or
subject to adjustment in a specified manner so as to preserve their real value; or
partly specified as mentioned in paragraph (a) above and partly subject to adjustment as mentioned in paragraph (b) above.
The annuity or annuities must be such as to provide the annuitant with sums which as to amount and time of payment correspond to the periodical payments described in the agreement.
Payments in respect of the annuity or annuities may be received on behalf of the annuitant by another person or received and held on trust for his benefit under a trust of which he is, during his lifetime, the sole beneficiary.
The Lord Chancellor may by an order made by statutory instrument provide that there shall for the purposes of this section be treated as an insurer any body specified in the order, being a body which, though not an insurer, appears to him to fulfil corresponding functions in relation to damages for personal injury claimed or awarded against persons of any class or description, and the reference in subsection (1)(b) above to a person being insured against the claim and his insurer shall be construed accordingly.
In the application of subsection (6) above to Scotland for the reference to the Lord Chancellor there shall be substituted a reference to the Secretary of State.
Where— then, for the purposes of section 4 above, the agreement settling the claim or action shall be treated as a structured settlement and any such annuity assigned in favour of that person shall be treated as an annuity purchased for him pursuant to the settlement.
an agreement is made settling a claim or action for damages for personal injury on terms whereby the damages are to consist wholly or partly of periodical payments;
the person against whom the claim or action is brought (or, if he is insured against the claim, his insurer) purchases one or more annuities; and
a subsequent agreement is made under which the annuity is, or the annuities are, assigned in favour of the person entitled to the payments (so as to secure that from a future date he receives the payments as the annuitant under the annuity or annuities),
Subsections (2) to (7) above shall apply to an agreement to which subsection (8) above applies as they apply to a structured settlement as defined in subsection (1) above (the reference in subsection (6) to subsection (1)(b) being read as a reference to subsection (8)(b)).
In cases where Regulation (EC) No. 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2007 on rail passengers’ rights and obligations applies, this section needs to be read in the light of Article 30 of the Uniform Rules concerning the contract for the international carriage of passengers and luggage by rail (damages to be awarded as annuity on request), as set out in Annex I to that Regulation.
A court awarding damages in an action for personal injury may, with the consent of the parties, make an order under which the damages are wholly or partly to take the form of periodical payments.
In this section “damages” includes an interim payment which the court, by virtue of rules of court in that behalf, orders the defendant to make to the plaintiff (or, in the application of this section to Scotland, the defender to make to the pursuer).
This section is without prejudice to any powers exerciseable apart from this section.
This section applies where—
a claim or action for damages for personal injury is settled on terms whereby the damages are to consist wholly or partly of periodical payments; or
a court awarding damages for personal injury makes an order incorporating such terms.
If it appears to a Minister of the Crown that the payments are to be made by a body in relation to which he has, by virtue of this section, power to do so, he may guarantee the payments to be made under the agreement or order.
The bodies in relation to which a Minister may give such a guarantee shall, subject to subsection (4) below, be such bodies as are designated in relation to the relevant government department by guidelines agreed upon between that department and the Treasury.
A guarantee purporting to be given by a Minister under this section shall not be invalidated by any failure on his part to act in accordance with such guidelines as are mentioned in subsection (3) above.
A guarantee under this section shall be given on such terms as the Minister concerned may determine but those terms shall in every case require the body in question to reimburse the Minister, with interest, for any sums paid by him in fulfilment of the guarantee.
Any sums required by a Minister for fulfilling a guarantee under this section shall be defrayed out of money provided by Parliament and any sums received by him by way of reimbursement or interest shall be paid into the Consolidated Fund.
A Minister who has given one or more guarantees under this section shall, as soon as possible after the end of each financial year, lay before each House of Parliament a statement showing what liabilities are outstanding in respect of the guarantees in that year, what sums have been paid in that year in fulfilment of the guarantees and what sums (including interest) have been recovered in that year in respect of the guarantees or are still owing.
In this section “government department” means any department of Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom and for the purposes of this section a government department is a relevant department in relation to a Minister if he has responsibilities in respect of that department.
In the application of subsection (3) above to Scotland, for the words from “guidelines” to the end there shall be substituted “the Minister”.
Schedule 1 to this Act has effect for conferring corresponding powers on Northern Ireland departments.
In the application of this section to Scotland, “relevant government department” shall be read as if it was a reference to any part of the Scottish Administration and subsection (8) shall cease to have effect.
Civil Procedure Rules may require a court to take specified matters into account in considering—
whether to order periodical payments;
the security of the continuity of payment;
whether to approve an assignment or charge.
For the purposes of section 2(4)(c) and (7)(d) “government or health service body” means a body designated as a government body or a health service body by order made by the Lord Chancellor.
An order under subsection (2)—
shall be made by statutory instrument, and
shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
Section 2(6) is without prejudice to a person’s power to assign a right to the scheme manager established under section 212 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
In section 2 “damages” includes an interim payment which a court orders a defendant to make to a claimant.
In the application of this section and section 2 to Northern Ireland—
a reference to Civil Procedure Rules shall be taken as a reference to rules of court, ...
a reference to a claimant shall be taken as a reference to a plaintiff.
a reference to the Lord Chancellor shall be taken as a reference to the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland, and
for subsection (3)(a) and (b) of this section there is substituted “shall be made by statutory rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979; and is subject to negative resolution within the meaning of section 41(6) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954”.
Section 2 is without prejudice to any power exercisable apart from that section.
Subject to subsection (2) below, in this Act “personal injury” includes any disease and any impairment of a person’s physical or mental condition and references to a claim or action for personal injury include references to such a claim or action brought by virtue of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 and to a claim or action brought by virtue of the Fatal Accidents Act 1976.
In the application of this Act to Scotland “personal injury” has the meaning given by section 10(1) of the M3Damages (Scotland) Act 1976 same meaning as in the Damages (Scotland) Act 2011 .
In the application of subsection (1) above to Northern Ireland for the references to the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 and to the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 there shall be substituted respectively references to the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (Northern Ireland) 1937 and the Fatal Accidents (Northern Ireland) Order 1977.
The Lord Chancellor may by order enable a court which has made an order for periodical payments to vary the order in specified circumstances (otherwise than in accordance with section 2(5)(d)).
The Lord Chancellor may by order enable a court in specified circumstances to vary the terms on which a claim or action for damages for personal injury is settled by agreement between the parties if the agreement—
provides for periodical payments, and
expressly permits a party to apply to a court for variation in those circumstances.
An order under this section may make provision—
which operates wholly or partly by reference to a condition or other term of the court’s order or of the agreement;
about the nature of an order which may be made by a court on a variation;
about the matters to be taken into account on considering variation;
of a kind that could be made by Civil Procedure Rules or, in relation to Northern Ireland, rules of court (and which may be expressed to be with or without prejudice to the power to make those rules).
An order under this section may apply (with or without modification) or amend an enactment about provisional or further damages.
An order under this section shall be subject to any order under section 1 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (allocation between High Court and county courts).
An order under this section—
shall be made by statutory instrument,
may not be made unless the Lord Chancellor has consulted such persons as he thinks appropriate,
may not be made unless a draft has been laid before and approved by resolution of each House of Parliament, and
may include transitional, consequential or incidental provision.
In subsection (4)—
In the application of this section to Northern Ireland—
a reference to the Lord Chancellor shall be taken as a reference to the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland;
in subsection (6)(a) for “statutory instrument” substitute “statutory rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979”;
in subsection (6)(c) for “each House of Parliament” substitute “the Northern Ireland Assembly”;
section 41(3) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954 applies for the purposes of subsection (6)(c) in relation to the laying of a draft as it applies in relation to the laying of a statutory document under an enactment.
“provisional damages” means damages awarded by virtue of subsection (2)(a) of section 32A of the Senior Courts Act 1981 or section 51 of the County Courts Act 1984 (or, in relation to Northern Ireland, paragraph 10(2)(a) of Schedule 6 to the Administration of Justice Act 1982), and
“further damages” means damages awarded by virtue of subsection (2)(b) of either of those sections (or, in relation to Northern Ireland, paragraph 10(2)(b) of Schedule 6 to the Administration of Justice Act 1982).
This Act may be cited as the Damages Act 1996.
Section 3 does not extend to Scotland but, subject to that, this Act extends to the whole of the United Kingdom.
This Act comes into force at the end of the period of two months beginning with the day on which it is passed.
Section 6(9).
This Schedule applies where—
a claim or action for damages for personal injury is settled on terms whereby the damages are to consist wholly or partly of periodical payments; or
a court awarding damages for personal injury makes an order incorporating such terms.
If is appears to a Northern Ireland department that the payments are to be made by a body in relation to which that department has, by virtue of this Schedule, power to do so, that department may guarantee the payments to be made under the agreement or order.
The bodies in relation to which a Northern Ireland department may give such a guarantee shall, subject to paragraph 4 below, be such bodies as are designated in relation to that department by guidelines agreed upon between that department and the Department of Finance and Personnel in Northern Ireland.
A guarantee purporting to be given by a Northern Ireland department under this Schedule shall not be invalidated by any failure on the part of that department to act in accordance with such guidelines as are mentioned in paragraph 3 above.
A guarantee under this Schedule shall be given on such terms as the Northern Ireland department concerned may determine but those terms shall in every case require the body in question to reimburse that department, with interest, for any sums paid by that department in fulfilment of the guarantee.
A Northern Ireland department which has given one or more guarantees under this Schedule shall, as soon as possible after the end of each financial year, lay before the Northern Ireland Assembly a statement showing what liabilities are outstanding in respect of the guarantees in that year, what sums have been paid in that year in fulfilment of the guarantees and what sums (including interest) have been recovered in that year in respect of the guarantees or are still owing.
The Lord Chancellor must review the rate of return periodically in accordance with this paragraph. The first review of the rate of return must be started within the 90 day period following commencement. Each subsequent review of the rate of return must be started within the 5 year period following the last review. It is for the Lord Chancellor to decide— In this paragraph— For the purposes of this paragraph a review is concluded on the day when the Lord Chancellor makes a determination under paragraph 2 or 3 (as the case may be) as a result of the review.
This paragraph applies when the Lord Chancellor is required by paragraph 1(2) to conduct a review of the rate of return. The Lord Chancellor must review the rate of return and determine whether it should be— The Lord Chancellor must conduct that review and make that determination within the 140 day review period. In conducting the review, the Lord Chancellor must consult— The consultation of the Government Actuary must start within the period of 20 days beginning with the day on which the 140 day review period starts. The Government Actuary must respond to the consultation within the period of 80 days beginning with the day on which the Government Actuary’s response to the consultation is requested. The exercise of the power of the Lord Chancellor under this paragraph to determine whether the rate of return should be changed or kept unchanged is subject to paragraph 4. When deciding what response to give to the Lord Chancellor under this paragraph, the Government Actuary and the Treasury must take into account the duties imposed on the Lord Chancellor by paragraph 4. During any period when the office of Government Actuary is vacant, a reference in this paragraph to the Government Actuary is to be read as a reference to the Deputy Government Actuary. In this paragraph “140 day review period” means the period of 140 days beginning with the day which the Lord Chancellor decides (under paragraph 1) should be the day on which the review is to start.
This paragraph applies whenever the Lord Chancellor is required by paragraph 1(3) to conduct a review of the rate of return. The Lord Chancellor must review the rate of return and determine whether it should be— The Lord Chancellor must conduct that review and make that determination within the 180 day review period. In conducting the review, the Lord Chancellor must consult— The expert panel must respond to the consultation within the period of 90 days beginning with the day on which its response to the consultation is requested. The exercise of the power of the Lord Chancellor under this paragraph to determine whether the rate of return should be changed or kept unchanged is subject to paragraph 4. When deciding what response to give to the Lord Chancellor under this paragraph, the expert panel and the Treasury must take into account the duties imposed on the Lord Chancellor by paragraph 4. In this paragraph “180 day review period” means the period of 180 days beginning with the day which the Lord Chancellor decides (under paragraph 1) should be the day on which the review is to start.
The Lord Chancellor must comply with this paragraph when determining under paragraph 2 or 3 whether the rate of return should be changed or kept unchanged (“the rate determination”). The Lord Chancellor must make the rate determination on the basis that the rate of return should be the rate that, in the opinion of the Lord Chancellor, a recipient of relevant damages could reasonably be expected to achieve if the recipient invested the relevant damages for the purpose of securing that— In making the rate determination as required by sub-paragraph (2), the Lord Chancellor must make the following assumptions— That does not limit the assumptions which the Lord Chancellor may make. In making the rate determination as required by sub-paragraph (2), the Lord Chancellor must— That does not limit the factors which may inform the Lord Chancellor when making the rate determination. In this paragraph “relevant damages” means a sum awarded as damages for future pecuniary loss in an action for personal injury.
When the Lord Chancellor makes a rate determination, the Lord Chancellor must—
give reasons for the rate determination made, and
publish such information as the Lord Chancellor thinks appropriate about—
the response of the expert panel established for the review, or
in the case of a review required by paragraph 1(2), the response of the Government Actuary or the Deputy Government Actuary (as the case may be).
For each review of a rate of return required by paragraph 1(3), the Lord Chancellor is to establish a panel (referred to in this Schedule as an “expert panel”) consisting of— The Lord Chancellor must exercise the power to appoint the appointed members to secure that— An expert panel established for a review of a rate of return ceases to exist once it has responded to the consultation relating to the review. A person may be a member of more than one expert panel at any one time. A person may not become an appointed member if the person is ineligible for membership. A person who is an appointed member ceases to be a member if the person becomes ineligible for membership. The Lord Chancellor may end an appointed member’s membership of the panel if the Lord Chancellor is satisfied that— During any period when the office of Government Actuary is vacant the Deputy Government Actuary is to be a member of the panel and is to chair it. A person is “ineligible for membership” of an expert panel if the person is— In this paragraph “appointed member” means a person appointed by the Lord Chancellor to be a member of an expert panel.
The quorum of an expert panel is four members, one of whom must be the Government Actuary (or the Deputy Government Actuary when the office of Government Actuary is vacant). In the event of a tied vote on any decision, the person chairing the panel is to have a second casting vote. The panel may— The Lord Chancellor must make arrangements for an expert panel to be provided with the resources which the Lord Chancellor considers to be appropriate for the panel to exercise its functions. The Government Actuary’s Department, or any other government department, may enter into arrangements made by the Lord Chancellor under sub-paragraph (4). The Lord Chancellor must make arrangements for the appointed members of an expert panel to be paid any remuneration and expenses which the Lord Chancellor considers to be appropriate.
This paragraph applies if two or more rates of return are prescribed under section A1. The requirements— apply separately in relation to each rate of return. As respects a review relating to a particular rate of return, a reference in this Schedule to the last review conducted under a particular provision is to be read as a reference to the last review relating to that rate of return.
In this Schedule— A provision of this Schedule that refers to the rate of return being changed is to be read as also referring to— A provision of this Schedule that refers to the rate of return being kept unchanged is to be read as also referring to— A provision of this Schedule that refers to a review of the rate of return is to be read as also referring to—
(introduced by section B1(3))
The rate-assessor must review any original rate of return. A review under sub-paragraph (1) must be started by the rate-assessor on the appointed day. For the purpose of this paragraph—
The rate-assessor must review every subsequent rate of return. A review under sub-paragraph (1) must be started by the rate-assessor— Where a review under sub-paragraph (1) is started earlier by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)(b), it is to be treated as an extra review that does not affect the running of the 5-year period in relation to the previous review (and no 5-year period runs under sub-paragraph (2)(a) in relation to the extra review). For the purpose of this paragraph—
A review of a rate of return under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) must be concluded by the rate-assessor within the 90-day period. For the purpose of this paragraph, the 90-day period is the period of 90 days beginning with the day on which the review must be started by the rate-assessor.
The conduct by the rate-assessor of a review of a rate of return under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is governed by— A rate of return is to be set as a result of a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) accordingly (plus see paragraph 23 as to reporting afterwards on the conduct of such a review).
In a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1), the rate-assessor must determine whether a rate of return to be set is to be—
different from the rate of return with which the review is concerned, or
the same as the rate of return with which the review is concerned.
In a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1), the rate-assessor must have regard to views— where received by the rate-assessor timeously in connection with the review.
of any person whom the rate-assessor chooses to consult, and
of any person whose advice the rate-assessor chooses to seek,
The basis on which the rate-assessor is to make a rate determination in a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is as narrated in sub-paragraph (2). A rate of return should reflect the return that could reasonably be expected to be achieved by a person who invests— This is without prejudice to paragraphs 10 and 20 (with paragraph 10 to be met before paragraph 20 is met). For the notional portfolio, see the table in paragraph 12(3).
The Scottish Ministers may by regulations modify a period mentioned in paragraph 7(2).
Allowance must be made by the rate-assessor for the impact of inflation on the value of the return or investment to which paragraph 7(2) relates. The impact of inflation is to be allowed for by reference to, whether indicating an upward or downward trend—
The standard adjustments must be made by the rate-assessor to a rate of return that would be arrived at but for this paragraph. The standard adjustments are the deduction of—
The Scottish Ministers may by regulations modify a figure appearing in paragraph 10(2)(a) or (b) (and update the adjacent text so that percentage points are referred to correctly in the singular or plural). A figure as so modified—
As for the basis on which the rate-assessor is to proceed by virtue of paragraph 7(1), the notional portfolio is a combination of various types of things for investment in. In the table— Here is the table— cash or equivalents 10% nominal gilts 15% index-linked gilts 10% UK equities 7.5% overseas equities 12.5% high-yield bonds 5% investment-grade credit 30% property (heritable or moveable) 5% other types (see the examples) 5% Examples of other types as mentioned at the bottom of the first column of the table are infrastructure, commodities, hedge funds and absolute return funds.
So far as necessary, if— the entry is or (as the case may be) examples are to be interpreted by the rate-assessor as appropriate by bringing to bear professional knowledge of what the relevant terminology is commonly understood to mean in investment contexts.
an entry in the first column of the table is not ascribed meaning by regulations under paragraph 14, or
any associated examples are not ascribed meaning by regulations under paragraph 14,
The Scottish Ministers may by regulations ascribe meaning to—
an entry in the first column of the table in paragraph 12(3),
any associated examples.
The Scottish Ministers may by regulations— A figure so added, or as so modified—
Before a review under paragraph 2(1) is due to start, the Scottish Ministers must consider whether regulations under paragraph 14 or 15 are necessary for ensuring that the notional portfolio remains suitable for investment in by a hypothetical investor. In considering the matter, the Scottish Ministers must consult such persons as they consider appropriate. In considering the matter, the Scottish Ministers must consult such persons as they consider appropriate. No consideration of the matter is required ahead of an extra review as mentioned in paragraph 2(3). For who is a hypothetical investor, see paragraph 17(1).
A hypothetical investor is someone who falls within each of sub-paragraphs (2) to (4). That is, someone who— That is, someone who— That is, someone whose objectives are of securing that the damages will—
For the purpose of paragraphs 16 and 17—
a reference to damages is to damages of the kind mentioned in section B1(1), and
the damages are to be assumed to be received in a lump sum (rather than by way of periodical payments).
A rate of return is to be set by the rate-assessor as a percentage figure. The figure may be— If the figure is not a whole number (including zero), the number is to comprise or incorporate a decimal fraction of 0.25, 0.5 or 0.75.
A rate of return that would be arrived at but for this paragraph is to be rounded up or down by the rate-assessor to the nearest figure permitted, if necessary so as to come to— If two permitted figures are equally near when rounding under sub-paragraph (1) arises, rounding is to be to whichever of the figures is reached—
Except where the Scottish Ministers by regulations require more than one rate of return to be set by the rate-assessor, a rate of return is to be set so as to have effect for all cases. Where more than one rate of return is set for the time being by virtue of regulations under sub-paragraph (1), a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is to be conducted separately in relation to each rate of return (and a reference in paragraph 2(4)(b) to the previous review is to be read as necessary for this).
Regulations under paragraph 21(1) must—
specify the circumstances to which each rate of return is to relate,
require the rate-assessor's report under paragraph 23 to cover each rate of return separately.
After a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is concluded, the rate-assessor must send to the Scottish Ministers a report on the conduct of the review. The report is to be sent to the Scottish Ministers without undue delay (and no later than on the last day of the 90-day period described in paragraph 3(2)). The report is to—
The Scottish Ministers must lay the report before the Scottish Parliament as soon as practicable after the day on which they receive the report from the rate-assessor. The rate-assessor must publish the report on the same day as the report is laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers.
A rate determination comes into effect at the beginning of the day after the day on which the report including the determination is laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers.
The Scottish Ministers must adequately reimburse the rate-assessor for costs, including as to staff and outlays, incurred by the rate-assessor in exercising the rate-assessor's functions with respect to a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1). No reimbursement is owed under sub-paragraph (1) if the rate-assessor is part of the Scottish Administration.
This sub-paragraph applies to a rate of return— A rate of return to which sub-paragraph (1) applies is to be treated from the appointed day as if it were set for the purpose of section B1(1). For the purpose of this paragraph, the appointed day is 1 July 2019.
A review under paragraph 1(1) of the position of there being no rate of return cannot cause the maintaining of that position, so in conducting such a review in relation to that position— On the question of a review under paragraph 1(1) of the position of there being no rate of return, see paragraph 1(3)(a)(ii).
Paragraph 6 extends to views received, in advance of the appointed day, in anticipation of the starting of a review under paragraph 1(1). For the purpose of this paragraph, the appointed day is 1 July 2019.
Paragraph 26 extends to costs incurred, in advance of the appointed day, in anticipation of the starting of a review under paragraph 1(1). For the purpose of this paragraph, the appointed day is 1 July 2019.
Regulations under this schedule may— Regulations under this schedule are subject to the affirmative procedure.
In this schedule, a reference to the rate-assessor is to the official rate-assessor as mentioned in section B1(1).
Sub-paragraphs (2) to (5) are also for construing this schedule. A rate of return is a rate of return for the purpose of section B1(1). A rate of return is set as a result of a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) on the making in the review of a rate determination by the rate-assessor. A review of a rate of return under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is concluded when the rate-assessor makes a rate determination in the review. A rate determination is a determination by the rate-assessor that is to be made in a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) of what the new rate of return is, either—
The rate-assessor must review any original rate of return. A review under sub-paragraph (1) must be started by the rate-assessor on the appointed day. For the purposes of this paragraph, an original rate of return is—
The rate-assessor must review every subsequent rate of return. A review under sub-paragraph (1) must be started by the rate-assessor— Where a review under sub-paragraph (1) is started earlier by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)(a)(ii) or (2)(b)(ii), it is to be treated as an extra review that does not affect the starting date for the first review of 1st July 2024 or the running of the 5-year period in relation to the previous review (and no 5-year period runs under sub-paragraph (2) in relation to the extra review). For the purposes of this paragraph—
A review of a rate of return under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) must be concluded by the rate-assessor within the 90-day period. For the purposes of this paragraph, the 90-day period is the period of 90 days beginning with the day on which the review must be started by the rate-assessor.
The conduct by the rate-assessor of a review of a rate of return under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is governed by— A rate of return is to be set as a result of a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) accordingly (plus see paragraph 23 as to reporting afterwards on the conduct of such a review).
In a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1), the rate-assessor must determine whether a rate of return to be set is to be—
different from the rate of return with which the review is concerned, or
the same as the rate of return with which the review is concerned.
In a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1), the rate-assessor must have regard to views— where received by the rate-assessor within a reasonable time in connection with the review.
of any person whom the rate-assessor chooses to consult, and
of any person whose advice the rate-assessor chooses to seek,
The basis on which the rate-assessor is to make a rate determination in a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is as set out in sub-paragraph (2). A rate of return should reflect the return that could reasonably be expected to be achieved by a person who invests— This is without prejudice to paragraphs 10 and 20 (with paragraph 10 to be met before paragraph 20 is met). The notional portfolio is shown in the table in paragraph 12(3).
The Department of Justice may by regulations modify a period mentioned in paragraph 7(2).
Allowance must be made by the rate-assessor for the impact of inflation on the value of the return or investment to which paragraph 7(2) relates. The impact of inflation is to be allowed for by reference to, whether indicating an upward or downward trend— In sub-paragraph (2), “the retail prices index” means the general index (for all items) published by the Statistics Board or, if that index is not published for a relevant month, any substituted index or index figures published by that Board.
The standard adjustments must be made by the rate-assessor to a rate of return that would be arrived at but for this paragraph. The standard adjustments are the deduction of—
The Department of Justice may by regulations modify a figure appearing in paragraph 10(2)(a) or (b). A figure as so modified—
As for the basis on which the rate-assessor is to proceed by virtue of paragraph 7(1), the notional portfolio is a combination of various types of things for investment in. In the table— The table is as follows— Cash or equivalents 10% Nominal gilts 15% Index-linked gilts 10% UK equities 7.5% Overseas equities 12.5% High-yield bonds 5% Investment-grade-credit 30% Property (heritable or moveable) 5% Other types (see the examples) 5% Examples of other types as mentioned in the first column of the table are infrastructure, commodities, hedge funds and absolute return funds.
So far as necessary, if— the entry is or (as the case may be) examples are to be interpreted by the rate-assessor as appropriate by bringing to bear professional knowledge of what the relevant terminology is commonly understood to mean in investment contexts.
an entry in the first column of the table is not ascribed meaning by regulations under paragraph 14,
any associated examples are not ascribed meaning by regulations under paragraph 14,
The Department of Justice may by regulations ascribe meaning to—
an entry in the first column of the table in paragraph 12(3),
any associated examples.
The Department of Justice may by regulations— A figure so added, or as so modified—
Before a review under paragraph 2(1) is due to start, the Department of Justice must consider whether regulations under paragraph 14 or 15 are necessary for ensuring that the notional portfolio remains suitable for investment in by a hypothetical investor. In considering the matter, the Department of Justice must consult such persons as it considers appropriate. No consideration of the matter is required ahead of an extra review as mentioned in paragraph 2(3).
A hypothetical investor is a person who falls within each of sub-paragraphs (2) to (4). A person falls within this sub-paragraph if the person— A person falls within this sub-paragraph if the person— A person falls within this sub-paragraph if the person is someone whose objectives are of securing that the damages will—
For the purpose of paragraphs 16 and 17—
a reference to damages is to damages of the kind mentioned in section C1(1), and
the damages are to be assumed to be received in a lump sum (rather than by way of periodical payments).
A rate of return is to be set by the rate-assessor as a percentage figure. The figure may be— If the figure is not a whole number (including zero), the number is to comprise or incorporate a decimal fraction of 0.25, 0.5 or 0.75.
A rate of return that would be arrived at but for this paragraph is to be rounded up or down by the rate-assessor to the nearest figure permitted, if necessary so as to come to— If two permitted figures are equally near when rounding under sub-paragraph (1) arises, rounding is to be to whichever of the figures is reached—
Except where the Department of Justice by regulations requires more than one rate of return to be set by the rate-assessor, a rate of return is to be set so as to have effect for all cases. Where more than one rate of return is set for the time being by virtue of regulations under sub-paragraph (1), a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is to be conducted separately in relation to each rate of return (and a reference in paragraph 2(4)(b) to the previous review is to be read as necessary for this).
Regulations under paragraph 21(1) must—
specify the circumstances to which each rate of return is to relate,
require the rate-assessor’s report under paragraph 23 to cover each rate of return separately.
After a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is concluded, the rate-assessor must send to the Department of Justice a report on the conduct of the review. The report is to be sent to the Department of Justice without undue delay (and no later than on the last day of the 90-day period described in paragraph 3(2)). The report is to—
The Department of Justice must lay the report before the Northern Ireland Assembly as soon as practicable after the day on which the Department receives the report from the rate-assessor. The rate-assessor must publish the report on the same day as the report is laid before the Northern Ireland Assembly by the Department of Justice.
A rate determination comes into effect at the beginning of the day after the day on which the report including the determination is laid before the Northern Ireland Assembly by the Department of Justice.
The Department of Justice must adequately reimburse the rate-assessor for costs, including as to staff and outlays, incurred by the rate-assessor in exercising the rate-assessor’s functions with respect to a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1).
This sub-paragraph applies to a rate of return— A rate of return to which sub-paragraph (1) applies is to be treated from the appointed day as if it were set for the purpose of section C1(1).
A review under paragraph 1(1) of the position of there being no rate of return cannot cause the maintaining of that position, so in conducting such a review in relation to that position— On the question of a review under paragraph 1(1) of the position of there being no rate of return, see paragraph 1(3)(b).
Paragraph 6 extends to views received, in advance of the appointed day, in anticipation of the starting of a review under paragraph 1(1).
Paragraph 26 extends to costs incurred, in advance of the appointed day, in anticipation of the starting of a review under paragraph 1(1).
Regulations under this Schedule may— The power to make regulations under this Schedule is exercisable by statutory rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979. Regulations under this Schedule may not be made unless a draft of the regulations has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, the Northern Ireland Assembly.
In this Schedule, a reference to the rate-assessor is to the official rate-assessor as mentioned in section C1(1).
Sub-paragraphs (2) to (5) apply for the interpretation of this Schedule. A rate of return is a rate of return for the purpose of section C1(1). A rate of return is set as a result of a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) and on the coming into effect of a rate determination made by the rate-assessor in that review. A review of a rate of return under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) is concluded when the rate-assessor makes a rate determination in the review. A rate determination is a determination by the rate-assessor that is to be made in a review under paragraph 1(1) or 2(1) of what the new rate of return is, either—
In this Schedule—
“the appointed day” means the day on which the Schedule to the Damages (Return on Investment) Act (Northern Ireland) 2022 comes into operation;
“the Department of Justice” means the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland.