Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine in response to the update by Ambassador Martin Sajdik and to the report by Ambassador Ertugrul Apakan
There is to be a body known as the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (in this Part referred to as “the ISC”).
The ISC is to consist of nine members who are to be drawn both from the members of the House of Commons and from the members of the House of Lords.
Each member of the ISC is to be appointed by the House of Parliament from which the member is to be drawn.
A person is not eligible to become a member of the ISC unless the person—
is nominated for membership by the Prime Minister, and
is not a Minister of the Crown.
Before deciding whether to nominate a person for membership, the Prime Minister must consult the Leader of the Opposition.
A member of the ISC is to be the Chair of the ISC chosen by its members.
Schedule 1 (which makes further provision about the ISC) has effect.
The ISC may examine or otherwise oversee the expenditure, administration, policy and operations of—
the Security Service,
the Secret Intelligence Service, and
the Government Communications Headquarters.
The ISC may examine or otherwise oversee such other activities of Her Majesty's Government in relation to intelligence or security matters as are set out in a memorandum of understanding.
The ISC may, by virtue of subsection (1) or (2), consider any particular operational matter but only so far as—
the ISC and the Prime Minister are satisfied that the matter—
is not part of any ongoing intelligence or security operation, and
is of significant national interest,
the Prime Minister has asked the ISC to consider the matter, or
the ISC's consideration of the matter is limited to the consideration of information provided voluntarily to the ISC (whether or not in response to a request by the ISC) by—
the Security Service,
the Secret Intelligence Service,
the Government Communications Headquarters, or
a government department.
The ISC's consideration of a particular operational matter under subsection (3)(a) or (b) must, in the opinion of the ISC and the Prime Minister, be consistent with any principles set out in, or other provision made by, a memorandum of understanding.
A memorandum of understanding under this section—
may include other provision about the ISC or its functions which is not of the kind envisaged in subsection (2) or (4),
must be agreed between the Prime Minister and the ISC, and
may be altered (or replaced with another memorandum) with the agreement of the Prime Minister and the ISC.
The ISC must publish a memorandum of understanding under this section and lay a copy of it before Parliament.
The ISC must make an annual report to Parliament on the discharge of its functions.
The ISC may make such other reports to Parliament as it considers appropriate concerning any aspect of its functions.
Before making a report to Parliament, the ISC must send it to the Prime Minister.
The ISC must exclude any matter from any report to Parliament if the Prime Minister, after consultation with the ISC, considers that the matter would be prejudicial to the continued discharge of the functions of the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service, the Government Communications Headquarters or any person carrying out activities falling within section 2(2).
A report by the ISC to Parliament must contain a statement as to whether any matter has been excluded from the report by virtue of subsection (4).
The ISC must lay before Parliament any report made by it to Parliament.
The ISC may make a report to the Prime Minister in relation to matters which would be excluded by virtue of subsection (4) if the report were made to Parliament.
In sections 1 to 3 and Schedule 1—
“the Human Rights Convention” means the Convention within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998 (see section 21(1) of that Act),
“residual disclosure jurisdiction” means any jurisdiction to order the disclosure of information which is not specifically conferred as such a jurisdiction by or under an enactment.
The following information is sensitive information for the purposes of paragraph 4(4)(a)—
information which might lead to the identification of, or provide details of, sources of information, other assistance or operational methods available to—
the Security Service,
the Secret Intelligence Service,
the Government Communications Headquarters, or
any part of a government department, or any part of Her Majesty's forces, which is engaged in intelligence or security activities,
information about particular operations which have been, are being or are proposed to be undertaken in pursuance of any of the functions of the persons mentioned in paragraph (a)(i) to (iv),
information provided by, or by an agency of, the Government of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom where that Government does not consent to the disclosure of the information.
the Government Communications Headquarters, or
In section 63A of the Data Protection Act 1998 (application to Parliament)—
in subsection (2), after “Commons,” insert “ other than where they are determined by or on behalf of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament, ”, and
in subsection (3), after “Lords,” insert “ other than where they are determined by or on behalf of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament, ”.
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 is amended as follows. In section 23 (information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters), in subsection (3), at the end insert— In Part 1 of Schedule 1 (Public Authorities; General)—
Section 69 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (trial by jury) is amended as follows. In subsection (1), at the end, insert “ or unless the court is of opinion that the trial will involve section 6 proceedings ”. After subsection (3) insert— In subsection (4) for “(3)” substitute “ (3B) ”. After subsection (5) insert—
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
“enactment” means an enactment whenever passed or made and includes an enactment contained in—
“closed material application” means an application of the kind mentioned in section 8(1)(a),
“enactment” means an enactment whenever passed or made and includes—
alleged information,
Section 62 of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 (trial with and without jury) is amended as follows. In subsection (2)— After subsection (4) insert— After subsection (7) insert—
In Article 54A of the Race Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1997 (claims under Article 20A in immigration cases), at the end, insert—
the Government Communications Headquarters, or
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The court seised of relevant civil proceedings may make a declaration that the proceedings are proceedings in which a closed material application may be made to the court.
The court may make such a declaration—
on the application of—
the Secretary of State (whether or not the Secretary of State is a party to the proceedings), or
any party to the proceedings, or
of its own motion.
The court may make such a declaration if it considers that the following two conditions are met.
The first condition is that—
a party to the proceedings would be required to disclose sensitive material in the course of the proceedings to another person (whether or not another party to the proceedings), or
a party to the proceedings would be required to make such a disclosure were it not for one or more of the following—
the possibility of a claim for public interest immunity in relation to the material,
the fact that there would be no requirement to disclose if the party chose not to rely on the material,
section 56(1) of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (exclusion for intercept material),
any other enactment that would prevent the party from disclosing the material but would not do so if the proceedings were proceedings in relation to which there was a declaration under this section.
The second condition is that it is in the interests of the fair and effective administration of justice in the proceedings to make a declaration.
The two conditions are met if the court considers that they are met in relation to any material that would be required to be disclosed in the course of the proceedings (and an application under subsection (2)(a) need not be based on all of the material that might meet the conditions or on material that the applicant would be required to disclose).
The court must not consider an application by the Secretary of State under subsection (2)(a) unless it is satisfied that the Secretary of State has, before making the application, considered whether to make, or advise another person to make, a claim for public interest immunity in relation to the material on which the application is based.
A declaration under this section must identify the party or parties to the proceedings who would be required to disclose the sensitive material (“a relevant person”).
Rules of court may—
provide for notification to the Secretary of State by a party to relevant civil proceedings, or by the court concerned, of proceedings to which a declaration under this section may be relevant,
provide for a stay or sist of relevant civil proceedings (whether on an application by a party to the proceedings or by the court concerned of its own motion) where a person is considering whether to apply for a declaration under this section,
provide for the Secretary of State, if not a party to proceedings in relation to which there is a declaration under this section or proceedings for or about such a declaration, to be joined as a party to the proceedings.
Rules of court must make provision—
requiring a person, before making an application under subsection (2)(a), to give notice of the person's intention to make an application to every other person entitled to make such an application in relation to the relevant civil proceedings,
requiring the applicant to inform every other such person of the outcome of the application.
In this section—
“Her Majesty's Government” means Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom,
“enactment” means an enactment whenever passed or made and includes—
an Act of the Scottish Parliament,
the Secret Intelligence Service, or
the Court of Appeal,
In section 69B(1)(a) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (disregarding notice of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission where it requires the disclosure of sensitive information)—
for “paragraph 4 of Schedule 3 to the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (c. 13)” substitute “ paragraph 5 of Schedule 1 to the Justice and Security Act 2013 ”, and
after “Committee” insert “ of Parliament ”.
In paragraph 14(1)(a) of Schedule 2 to the Equality Act 2006 (disregarding notice of the Commission for Equality and Human Rights where it requires the disclosure of sensitive information)—
for “paragraph 4 of Schedule 3 to the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (c. 13)” substitute “ paragraph 5 of Schedule 1 to the Justice and Security Act 2013 ”, and
after “Committee” insert “ of Parliament ”.
information contained in any form of document or stored in any other way, and
the Supreme Court,
The ISC may determine its own procedure; but this is subject to sub-paragraphs (2) to (5). If on any matter there is an equality of voting among the members of the ISC, the Chair of the ISC has a second or casting vote. The Chair of the ISC may appoint another member of the ISC to act, in the Chair's absence, as the chair of the ISC at any meeting of it. A person appointed under sub-paragraph (3) does not enjoy the right conferred on the Chair of the ISC by sub-paragraph (2). The quorum of the ISC is three. The ISC may take evidence on oath, and for that purpose may administer oaths.
“relevant civil proceedings” means any proceedings (other than proceedings in a criminal cause or matter) before—
a Measure or Act of the National Assembly for Wales,
This section applies where a court seised of relevant civil proceedings has made a declaration under section 6.
The court must keep the declaration under review, and may at any time revoke it if it considers that the declaration is no longer in the interests of the fair and effective administration of justice in the proceedings.
The court must undertake a formal review of the declaration once the pre-trial disclosure exercise in the proceedings has been completed, and must revoke it if it considers that the declaration is no longer in the interests of the fair and effective administration of justice in the proceedings.
The court may revoke a declaration under subsection (2) or (3)—
on the application of—
the Secretary of State (whether or not the Secretary of State is a party to the proceedings), or
any party to the proceedings, or
of its own motion.
In deciding for the purposes of subsection (2) or (3) whether a declaration continues to be in the interests of the fair and effective administration of justice in the proceedings, the court must consider all of the material that has been put before it in the course of the proceedings (and not just the material on which the decision to make the declaration was based).
Rules of court must make provision—
as to how a formal review is to be conducted under subsection (3),
as to when the pre-trial disclosure exercise is to be considered to have been completed for the purposes of subsection (3).
In relation to proceedings before the Court of Session—
the reference in subsection (3) to the completion of the pre-trial disclosure exercise is a reference to the fixing of a hearing to determine the merits of the proceedings, and
the reference in subsection (6)(b) to when the pre-trial disclosure exercise is to be considered to have been completed is a reference to what constitutes a hearing to determine the merits of the proceedings.
Rules of court relating to any relevant civil proceedings in relation to which there is a declaration under section 6 (“section 6 proceedings”) must secure—
that a relevant person has the opportunity to make an application to the court for permission not to disclose material otherwise than to—
the court,
any person appointed as a special advocate, and
where the Secretary of State is not the relevant person but is a party to the proceedings, the Secretary of State,
that such an application is always considered in the absence of every other party to the proceedings (and every other party's legal representative),
that the court is required to give permission for material not to be disclosed if it considers that the disclosure of the material would be damaging to the interests of national security,
that, if permission is given by the court not to disclose material, it must consider requiring the relevant person to provide a summary of the material to every other party to the proceedings (and every other party's legal representative),
that the court is required to ensure that such a summary does not contain material the disclosure of which would be damaging to the interests of national security.
Rules of court relating to section 6 proceedings must secure that provision to the effect mentioned in subsection (3) applies in cases where a relevant person—
does not receive the permission of the court to withhold material, but elects not to disclose it, or
is required to provide another party to the proceedings with a summary of material that is withheld, but elects not to provide the summary.
The court must be authorised—
if it considers that the material or anything that is required to be summarised might adversely affect the relevant person's case or support the case of another party to the proceedings, to direct that the relevant person—
is not to rely on such points in that person's case, or
is to make such concessions or take such other steps as the court may specify, or
in any other case, to ensure that the relevant person does not rely on the material or (as the case may be) on that which is required to be summarised.
The appropriate law officer may appoint a person to represent the interests of a party in any section 6 proceedings from which the party (and any legal representative of the party) is excluded.
A person appointed under subsection (1) is referred to in this section as appointed as a “special advocate”.
The “appropriate law officer” is—
in relation to proceedings in England and Wales, the Attorney General,
in relation to proceedings in Scotland, the Advocate General for Scotland, and
in relation to proceedings in Northern Ireland, the Advocate General for Northern Ireland.
A person appointed as a special advocate is not responsible to the party to the proceedings whose interests the person is appointed to represent.
A person may be appointed as a special advocate only if—
in the case of an appointment by the Attorney General, the person has a general qualification for the purposes of section 71 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990,
in the case of an appointment by the Advocate General for Scotland, the person is an advocate or a solicitor who has rights of audience in the Court of Session or the High Court of Justiciary by virtue of section 25A of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980, and
in the case of an appointment by the Advocate General for Northern Ireland, the person is a member of the Bar of Northern Ireland.
Subject to sections 8, 9 and 11, rules of court relating to section 6 proceedings must secure that the rules of disclosure otherwise applicable to those proceedings continue to apply in relation to the disclosure of material by a relevant person.
A person making rules of court relating to section 6 proceedings must have regard to the need to secure that disclosures of information are not made where they would be damaging to the interests of national security.
Rules of court relating to section 6 proceedings may make provision—
about the mode of proof and about evidence in the proceedings,
enabling or requiring the proceedings to be determined without a hearing,
about legal representation in the proceedings,
enabling the proceedings to take place without full particulars of the reasons for decisions in the proceedings being given to a party to the proceedings (or to any legal representative of that party),
enabling the court concerned to conduct proceedings in the absence of any person, including a party to the proceedings (or any legal representative of that party),
about the functions of a person appointed as a special advocate,
enabling the court to give a party to the proceedings a summary of evidence taken in the party's absence.
In subsection (2) references to a party to the proceedings do not include the relevant person concerned and (if the Secretary of State is not the relevant person but is a party to the proceedings) the Secretary of State.
The following proceedings are to be treated as section 6 proceedings for the purposes of sections 8 to 10, this section and sections 12 to 14—
proceedings on, or in relation to, an application for a declaration under section 6,
proceedings on, or in relation to, a decision of the court to make a declaration under that section of its own motion,
proceedings on, or in relation to, an application for a revocation under section 7, and
proceedings on, or in relation to, a decision of the court to make a revocation under that section of its own motion.
In proceedings treated as section 6 proceedings by virtue of subsection (4), a relevant person, for the purposes of sections 8 to 10, this section and sections 12 to 14, is a person who would be required to disclose sensitive material in the course of the proceedings.
The Secretary of State must—
prepare a report on the matters mentioned in subsection (2) for—
the period of twelve months beginning with the day on which section 6 comes into force, and
every subsequent twelve month period, and
lay a copy of each such report before Parliament.
The matters are—
the number of applications made during the reporting period—
by the Secretary of State under section 6(2)(a)(i) or 7(4)(a)(i), and
by persons other than the Secretary of State under section 6(2)(a)(ii) or 7(4)(a)(ii),
the number of declarations made by the court under section 6(1), and the number of revocations made by the court under section 7(2) or (3), during the reporting period—
in response to applications made by the Secretary of State during the reporting period,
in response to applications made by the Secretary of State during previous reporting periods,
in response to applications made by persons other than the Secretary of State during the reporting period,
in response to applications made by persons other than the Secretary of State during previous reporting periods, and
of the court's own motion,
the number of final judgments given in section 6 proceedings during the reporting period which are closed judgments, and
the number of such judgments which are not closed judgments.
The report may also include such other matters as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
The duty under subsection (1) in relation to the preparation and laying of a report must be carried out as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of the twelve month period to which the report relates.
In this section—
The Secretary of State must appoint a person to review the operation of sections 6 to 11 (the “reviewer”).
The reviewer must carry out a review of the operation of sections 6 to 11 in respect of the period of five years beginning with the day on which section 6 comes into force.
The review must be completed as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of the period to which the review relates.
As soon as reasonably practicable after completing a review under this section, the reviewer must send to the Secretary of State a report on its outcome.
On receiving a report under subsection (4), the Secretary of State must lay a copy of it before Parliament.
Before laying a copy of a report before Parliament under subsection (5), the Secretary of State may, after consulting the reviewer, exclude from the copy any part of the report that would, in the opinion of the Secretary of State, be damaging to the interests of national security if it were included in the copy laid before Parliament.
The Secretary of State may pay to the reviewer—
expenses incurred by the reviewer in carrying out functions under this section, and
such allowances as the Secretary of State determines.
In sections 6 to 13 and this section— and references to a party's legal representative do not include a person appointed as a special advocate.
“special advocate” has the meaning given by section 9(2),
Nothing in sections 6 to 13 and this section (or in any provision made by virtue of them)—
restricts the power to make rules of court or the matters to be taken into account when doing so,
affects the common law rules as to the withholding, on grounds of public interest immunity, of any material in any proceedings, or
is to be read as requiring a court or tribunal to act in a manner inconsistent with Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention.
After section 2B of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 (appeals against certain deprivation of citizenship decisions) insert—
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 18 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (exclusion of intercepted communications etc. from legal proceedings: exceptions) is amended as follows.
In subsection (1), after paragraph (d) insert—.
In subsection (2)—
in the opening words, for “(db)” substitute “(dza)”,
after “anything—” insert—.
This section applies where, by way of civil proceedings, a person (“A”) seeks the disclosure of information by another person (“B”) on the grounds that—
wrongdoing by another person (“C”) has, or may have, occurred,
B was involved with the carrying out of the wrongdoing (whether innocently or not), and
the disclosure is reasonably necessary to enable redress to be obtained or a defence to be relied on in connection with the wrongdoing.
A court may not, in exercise of its residual disclosure jurisdiction, order the disclosure of information sought (whether that disclosure would be to A or to another person) if the information is sensitive information.
“Sensitive information” means information—
held by an intelligence service,
obtained from, or held on behalf of, an intelligence service,
derived in whole or part from information obtained from, or held on behalf of, an intelligence service,
relating to an intelligence service, or
specified or described in a certificate issued by the Secretary of State, in relation to the proceedings, as information which B should not be ordered to disclose.
The Secretary of State may issue a certificate under subsection (3)(e) only if the Secretary of State considers that it would be contrary to the public interest for B to disclose—
the information,
whether the information exists, or
whether B has the information.
For the purposes of subsection (4) a disclosure is contrary to the public interest if it would cause damage—
to the interests of national security, or
to the interests of the international relations of the United Kingdom.
In this section—
“information” includes—
This section—
enables the Secretary of State to issue a certificate under subsection (3)(e) where the Secretary of State is B as it enables the Secretary of State to issue such a certificate where another person is B, and
does not restrict any other right or privilege that the Secretary of State can claim in order to resist an application for the disclosure of information.
Where the Secretary of State has issued a certificate under section 17(3)(e) in relation to proceedings, any party to the proceedings may apply to the relevant court to set aside the decision on the ground in subsection (2).
That ground is that the Secretary of State ought not to have determined, in relation to the information specified or described in the certificate, that a disclosure by B as mentioned in section 17(4) would be contrary to the public interest.
In determining whether the decision to issue the certificate should be set aside on the ground in subsection (2), the relevant court must apply the principles which would be applied in judicial review proceedings.
Proceedings arising by virtue of this section are to be treated as section 6 proceedings for the purposes of sections 8 to 14.
Sections 8 to 14 apply in relation to proceedings treated as section 6 proceedings by subsection (4) as if—
the Secretary of State were the relevant person, and
the references to the interests of national security in sections 8, 11 and 13 were references to the interests of national security or the interests of the international relations of the United Kingdom.
In this section “relevant court” means—
if the court seised of the proceedings in relation to which the certificate has been issued is a county court, the High Court,
if the court seised of those proceedings is the sheriff, the Court of Session, and
in any other case, the court seised of those proceedings.
Schedules 2 and 3 (which make consequential and transitional provision) have effect.
The Secretary of State may by order made by statutory instrument make such transitional, transitory or saving provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate in connection with the coming into force of any provision of this Act.
The following provisions— come into force on such day as the Secretary of State may by order made by statutory instrument appoint; and different days may be appointed for different purposes.
section 1 and Schedule 1,
sections 2 to 18,
section 19(1) (except so far as relating to paragraph 4 of Schedule 3),
Schedule 2, and
Schedule 3 (other than paragraph 4 of that Schedule),
The following provisions— come into force on the day on which this Act is passed.
section 19(1) so far as relating to paragraph 4 of Schedule 3,
paragraph 4 of Schedule 3,
section 19(2), and
this section,
Subject to subsections (4) to (6), this Act extends to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
In Schedule 2—
the amendments of the Senior Courts Act 1981 extend to England and Wales only,
the amendments of the Equality Act 2006 and the Equality Act 2010 extend to England and Wales and Scotland only, and
the amendment of the Race Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1997 extends to Northern Ireland only.
Her Majesty may by Order in Council provide for section 15 and paragraph 9 of Schedule 2 to extend, with or without modifications, to any of the Channel Islands or to the Isle of Man.
An Order under subsection (5) may, in particular, include (with or without modifications) transitional provision of the kind permitted by paragraph 4 of Schedule 3.
This Act may be cited as the Justice and Security Act 2013.
Section 1(7)
“Leader of the Opposition” has the same meaning as in the Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975,
Subject as follows, a person appointed as a member of the ISC during a Parliament holds office for the duration of that Parliament. A member of the ISC vacates office if— A member of the ISC may resign at any time by notice given to— A person who ceases to be a member of the ISC is eligible for reappointment. Section 1(2) does not affect the validity of anything done between the occurrence of a vacancy and the vacancy being filled. Anything which, immediately before the end of a Parliament, is in the process of being done or omitted to be done by or in relation to the ISC may be continued by or in relation to the ISC in the new Parliament. Anything done or omitted to be done by or in relation to the ISC in a Parliament (or treated as so done or omitted) is, if in force or effective immediately before the end of that Parliament, to have effect as if done or omitted by or in relation to the ISC in the new Parliament so far as that is required for continuing its effect in that Parliament.
This paragraph applies to information requested by the ISC in the exercise of its functions that— If the Director-General of the Security Service, the Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service or the Director of the Government Communications Headquarters is asked by the ISC to disclose the information, then, as to the whole or any part of the information which is sought, that person must either— If the ISC asks a government department or any part of a government department to disclose the information, then, as to the whole or any part of the information which is sought, the relevant Minister of the Crown must either— The Secretary of State may decide under sub-paragraph (2)(b) or (3)(b) that information should not be disclosed only if the Secretary of State considers that— In deciding for the purposes of sub-paragraph (4)(b) whether it would be proper not to disclose information, the Secretary of State must have regard to any guidance issued by a Minister of the Crown or a government department concerning the provision of evidence by civil servants to Select Committees. The disclosure of information to the ISC in accordance with sub-paragraph (2) is to be regarded for the purposes of the Security Service Act 1989 or the Intelligence Services Act 1994 as necessary for the proper discharge of the functions of the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service or (as the case may be) the Government Communications Headquarters. In this paragraph “relevant Minister of the Crown”, in relation to a request for information, means—
Evidence given by a person who is a witness before the ISC may not be used in any civil or disciplinary proceedings, unless the evidence was given in bad faith. Evidence given by a person who is a witness before the ISC may not be used against the person in any criminal proceedings, unless the evidence was given in bad faith.
“notice” means notice in writing.
A Minister of the Crown—
may make payments to either House of Parliament in respect of any expenditure incurred, or to be incurred, by either House in relation to the ISC,
may provide staff, accommodation or other resources to either House of Parliament for the purposes of the ISC,
may make payments, or provide staff, accommodation or other resources, to the ISC, or
may otherwise make payments, or provide staff, accommodation or other resources, to any person for the purposes of the ISC.
This paragraph applies to information received by the ISC in private in connection with the exercise of its functions. The ISC— The restrictions on publication and disclosure of information in sub-paragraph (2) do not apply if—
The following provisions of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 are repealed—
section 10 (the Intelligence and Security Committee),
section 11(1)(c) (the definition of “Minister of the Crown”), and
Schedule 3 (further provision about the Intelligence and Security Committee).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 is amended as follows. After section 6 (appointment of person to represent appellant's interests) insert— After section 7(1) (appeals from the Commission) insert—
In section 115 of the Equality Act 2010 (immigration cases), at the end, insert—
Section 19(1)
Section 19(1)
The persons who, immediately before the coming into force of section 1(1), were members of the previous Intelligence and Security Committee become, on the coming into force of section 1(1), members of the new Intelligence and Security Committee. The person who, immediately before the coming into force of section 1(1), was the Chairman of the previous Intelligence and Security Committee becomes, on the coming into force of section 1(1), the Chair of the new Intelligence and Security Committee. The new Intelligence and Security Committee may have access to documents or other information provided or belonging to the previous Intelligence and Security Committee. In this paragraph—
Sections 6 to 14, and paragraphs 7, 8 and 11 of Schedule 2 (other than paragraph 11(3)(b)(i) and (ii)), apply in relation to proceedings begun, but not finally determined, before the coming into force of section 6 (in addition to proceedings begun on or after the coming into force of that section).
The first time after the passing of this Act that rules of court are made in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 6 to 14 in relation to proceedings in England and Wales or in Northern Ireland before a court of a particular description, the rules (together with any related rules of court) may be made by the Lord Chancellor instead of by the person who would otherwise make them. Sub-paragraph (1) does not apply to rules of court in relation to proceedings before the Supreme Court. Before making rules of court under sub-paragraph (1), the Lord Chancellor must consult— But the Lord Chancellor is not required to undertake any other consultation before making the rules. A requirement to consult under sub-paragraph (3) may be satisfied by consultation that took place wholly or partly before the passing of this Act. Rules of court made by the Lord Chancellor under sub-paragraph (1)— In determining that period of 40 days no account is to be taken of any time during which Parliament is dissolved or prorogued or during which both Houses are adjourned for more than 4 days. If rules cease to have effect in accordance with sub-paragraph (6)— The following provisions do not apply to rules of court made by the Lord Chancellor under this paragraph— Until the coming into force of section 85 of the Courts Act 2003, the reference in sub-paragraph (9)(a) to section 3(6) of the Civil Procedure Act 1997 is to be read as a reference to section 3(2) of that Act. In this paragraph “related rules of court” means rules of court that—
An order under section 19(2) may, in particular, make provision about the application of section 15, and paragraphs 9, 10 and 12 of Schedule 2, to any direction or decision of the Secretary of State which— Provision of the kind mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) may, in particular, provide for— In this paragraph “the section 15 commencement day” means the day on which section 15 comes into force.
Sections 17 and 18 apply in relation to proceedings begun, but not finally determined, before the coming into force of section 17 (in addition to proceedings begun on or after the coming into force of that section).