Defamation Act 1996
In defamation proceedings a person has a defence if he shows that—
he was not the author, editor or publisher of the statement complained of,
he took reasonable care in relation to its publication, and
he did not know, and had no reason to believe, that what he did caused or contributed to the publication of a defamatory statement.
For this purpose “author”, “editor” and “publisher” have the following meanings, which are further explained in subsection (3)—
“author” means the originator of the statement, but does not include a person who did not intend that his statement be published at all;
A fair and accurate report of, or copy of or extract from, any adjudication, report, statement or notice issued by a body, officer or other person designated for the purposes of this paragraph— Subject to sub-paragraph (3), An order under this paragraph shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. An order under sub-paragraph (1)(c) shall be made by statutory rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979 and subject to negative resolution within the meaning of section 41(6) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954.
for Northern Ireland, by order of the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland
“editor” means a person having editorial or equivalent responsibility for the content of the statement or the decision to publish it; and
“publisher” means a commercial publisher, that is, a person whose business is issuing material to the public, or a section of the public, who issues material containing the statement in the course of that business.
“publisher” means a commercial publisher, that is, a person whose business is issuing material to the public, or a section of the public, who issues material containing the statement in the course of that business.
A person shall not be considered the author, editor or publisher of a statement if he is only involved— In a case not within paragraphs (a) to (e) the court may have regard to those provisions by way of analogy in deciding whether a person is to be considered the author, editor or publisher of a statement.
in printing, producing, distributing or selling printed material containing the statement;
in processing, making copies of, distributing, exhibiting or selling a film or sound recording (as defined in Part I of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988) containing the statement;
in processing, making copies of, distributing or selling any electronic medium in or on which the statement is recorded, or in operating or providing any equipment, system or service by means of which the statement is retrieved, copied, distributed or made available in electronic form;
as the broadcaster of a live programme containing the statement in circumstances in which he has no effective control over the maker of the statement;
as the operator of or provider of access to a communications system by means of which the statement is transmitted, or made available, by a person over whom he has no effective control.
Employees or agents of an author, editor or publisher are in the same position as their employer or principal to the extent that they are responsible for the content of the statement or the decision to publish it.
In determining for the purposes of this section whether a person took reasonable care, or had reason to believe that what he did caused or contributed to the publication of a defamatory statement, regard shall be had to—
the extent of his responsibility for the content of the statement or the decision to publish it,
the nature or circumstances of the publication, and
the previous conduct or character of the author, editor or publisher.
This section does not apply to any cause of action which arose before the section came into force.
A person who has published a statement alleged to be defamatory of another may offer to make amends under this section.
The offer may be in relation to the statement generally or in relation to a specific defamatory meaning which the person making the offer accepts that the statement conveys (“a qualified offer”).
An offer to make amends—
must be in writing,
must be expressed to be an offer to make amends under section 2 of the Defamation Act 1996, and
must state whether it is a qualified offer and, if so, set out the defamatory meaning in relation to which it is made.
An offer to make amends under this section is an offer— The fact that the offer is accompanied by an offer to take specific steps does not affect the fact that an offer to make amends under this section is an offer to do all the things mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c).
to make a suitable correction of the statement complained of and a sufficient apology to the aggrieved party,
to publish the correction and apology in a manner that is reasonable and practicable in the circumstances, and
to pay to the aggrieved party such compensation (if any), and such costs, as may be agreed or determined to be payable.
An offer to make amends under this section may not be made by a person after serving a defence in defamation proceedings brought against him by the aggrieved party in respect of the publication in question.
An offer to make amends under this section may be withdrawn before it is accepted; and a renewal of an offer which has been withdrawn shall be treated as a new offer.
If an offer to make amends under section 2 is accepted by the aggrieved party, the following provisions apply.
The party accepting the offer may not bring or continue defamation proceedings in respect of the publication concerned against the person making the offer, but he is entitled to enforce the offer to make amends, as follows.
If the parties agree on the steps to be taken in fulfilment of the offer, the aggrieved party may apply to the court for an order that the other party fulfil his offer by taking the steps agreed.
If the parties do not agree on the steps to be taken by way of correction, apology and publication, the party who made the offer may take such steps as he thinks appropriate, and may in particular—
make the correction and apology by a statement in open court in terms approved by the court, and
give an undertaking to the court as to the manner of their publication.
If the parties do not agree on the amount to be paid by way of compensation, it shall be determined by the court on the same principles as damages in defamation proceedings. The court shall take account of any steps taken in fulfilment of the offer and (so far as not agreed between the parties) of the suitability of the correction, the sufficiency of the apology and whether the manner of their publication was reasonable in the circumstances, and may reduce or increase the amount of compensation accordingly.
If the parties do not agree on the amount to be paid by way of costs, it shall be determined by the court on the same principles as costs awarded in court proceedings.
The acceptance of an offer by one person to make amends does not affect any cause of action against another person in respect of the same publication, subject as follows.
In England and Wales or Northern Ireland, for the purposes of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978—
the amount of compensation paid under the offer shall be treated as paid in bona fide settlement or compromise of the claim; and
where another person is liable in respect of the same damage (whether jointly or otherwise), the person whose offer to make amends was accepted is not required to pay by virtue of any contribution under section 1 of that Act a greater amount than the amount of the compensation payable in pursuance of the offer.
In Scotland—
subsection (2) of section 3 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1940 (right of one joint wrongdoer as respects another to recover contribution towards damages) applies in relation to compensation paid under an offer to make amends as it applies in relation to damages in an action to which that section applies; and
where another person is liable in respect of the same damage (whether jointly or otherwise), the person whose offer to make amends was accepted is not required to pay by virtue of any contribution under section 3(2) of that Act a greater amount than the amount of compensation payable in pursuance of the offer.
Proceedings under this section shall be heard and determined without a jury.
If an offer to make amends under section 2, duly made and not withdrawn, is not accepted by the aggrieved party, the following provisions apply.
The fact that the offer was made is a defence (subject to subsection (3)) to defamation proceedings in respect of the publication in question by that party against the person making the offer. A qualified offer is only a defence in respect of the meaning to which the offer related.
There is no such defence if the person by whom the offer was made knew or had reason to believe that the statement complained of— but it shall be presumed until the contrary is shown that he did not know and had no reason to believe that was the case.
referred to the aggrieved party or was likely to be understood as referring to him, and
was both false and defamatory of that party;
The person who made the offer need not rely on it by way of defence, but if he does he may not rely on any other defence. If the offer was a qualified offer, this applies only in respect of the meaning to which the offer related.
The offer may be relied on in mitigation of damages whether or not it was relied on as a defence.
The Limitation Act 1980 is amended as follows.
For section 4A (time limit for action for libel or slander) substitute—.
In section 28 (extension of limitation period in case of disability), for subsection (4A) substitute—.
For section 32A substitute—.
In section 36(1) (expiry of time limit no bar to equitable relief), for paragraph (aa) substitute—.
The amendments made by this section apply only to causes of action arising after the section comes into force.
The Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 is amended as follows.
In Article 6 (time limit: certain actions founded on tort) for paragraph (2) substitute—.
In Article 48 (extension of time limit), for paragraph (7) substitute—.
For Article 51 substitute—.
The amendments made by this section apply only to causes of action arising after the section comes into force.
In defamation proceedings the court shall not be asked to rule whether a statement is arguably capable, as opposed to capable, of bearing a particular meaning or meanings attributed to it.
In defamation proceedings the court may dispose summarily of the plaintiff’s claim in accordance with the following provisions.
The court may dismiss the plaintiff’s claim if it appears to the court that it has no realistic prospect of success and there is no reason why it should be tried.
The court may give judgment for the plaintiff and grant him summary relief (see section 9) if it appears to the court that there is no defence to the claim which has a realistic prospect of success, and that there is no other reason why the claim should be tried. Unless the plaintiff asks for summary relief, the court shall not act under this subsection unless it is satisfied that summary relief will adequately compensate him for the wrong he has suffered.
In considering whether a claim should be tried the court shall have regard to—
whether all the persons who are or might be defendants in respect of the publication complained of are before the court;
whether summary disposal of the claim against another defendant would be inappropriate;
the extent to which there is a conflict of evidence;
the seriousness of the alleged wrong (as regards the content of the statement and the extent of publication); and
whether it is justifiable in the circumstances to proceed to a full trial.
Proceedings under this section shall be heard and determined without a jury.
For the purposes of section 8 (summary disposal of claim) “summary relief” means such of the following as may be appropriate—
a declaration that the statement was false and defamatory of the plaintiff;
an order that the defendant publish or cause to be published a suitable correction and apology;
damages not exceeding £10,000 or such other amount as may be prescribed by order of the Lord Chancellor;
an order restraining the defendant from publishing or further publishing the matter complained of.
The content of any correction and apology, and the time, manner, form and place of publication, shall be for the parties to agree. If they cannot agree on the content, the court may direct the defendant to publish or cause to be published a summary of the court’s judgment agreed by the parties or settled by the court in accordance with rules of court. If they cannot agree on the time, manner, form or place of publication, the court may direct the defendant to take such reasonable and practicable steps as the court considers appropriate.
Subject to subsection (4) Any order under subsection (1)(c) shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
The Lord Chancellor must consult the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales before making any order under subsection (1)(c) in relation to England and Wales.
The Lord Chancellor must consult the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland before making any order under subsection (1)(c) in relation to Northern Ireland.
The Lord Chief Justice may nominate a judicial office holder (as defined in section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005) to exercise his functions under this section.
The Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland may nominate any of the following to exercise his functions under this section—
the holder of one of the offices listed in Schedule 1 to the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002;
a Lord Justice of Appeal (as defined in section 88 of that Act).
Any order made by the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland under subsection (1)(c) shall be made by statutory rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979, and shall be subject to negative resolution within the meaning of section 41(6) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954.
Provision may be made by rules of court as to the summary disposal of the plaintiff’s claim in defamation proceedings.
Without prejudice to the generality of that power, provision may be made—
authorising a party to apply for summary disposal at any stage of the proceedings;
authorising the court at any stage of the proceedings—
to treat any application, pleading or other step in the proceedings as an application for summary disposal, or
to make an order for summary disposal without any such application;
as to the time for serving pleadings or taking any other step in the proceedings in a case where there are proceedings for summary disposal;
requiring the parties to identify any question of law or construction which the court is to be asked to determine in the proceedings;
as to the nature of any hearing on the question of summary disposal, and in particular—
authorising the court to order affidavits or witness statements to be prepared for use as evidence at the hearing, and
requiring the leave of the court for the calling of oral evidence, or the introduction of new evidence, at the hearing;
authorising the court to require a defendant to elect, at or before the hearing, whether or not to make an offer to make amends under section 2.
In their application to Northern Ireland the provisions of sections 8 to 10 (summary disposal of claim) apply only to proceedings in the High Court.
In section 13 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968 (conclusiveness of convictions for purposes of defamation actions), in subsections (1) and (2) for “a person” substitute “ the plaintiff ” and for “that person” substitute “ he ”; and after subsection (2) insert—. The amendments made by this subsection apply only where the trial of the action begins after this section comes into force.
In section 12 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1968 (conclusiveness of convictions for purposes of defamation actions), in subsections (1) and (2) for “a person” substitute “ the pursuer ” and for “that person” substitute “ he ”; and after subsection (2) insert—. The amendments made by this subsection apply only for the purposes of an action begun after this section comes into force, whenever the cause of action arose.
In section 9 of the Civil Evidence Act (Northern Ireland) 1971 (conclusiveness of convictions for purposes of defamation actions), in subsections (1) and (2) for “a person” substitute “ the plaintiff ” and for “that person” substitute “ he ”; and after subsection (2) insert—. The amendments made by this subsection apply only where the trial of the action begins after this section comes into force.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Where the conduct of a person in or in relation to proceedings in Parliament is in issue in defamation proceedings, he may waive for the purposes of those proceedings, so far as concerns him, the protection of any enactment or rule of law which prevents proceedings in Parliament being impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament.
Where a person waives that protection—
any such enactment or rule of law shall not apply to prevent evidence being given, questions being asked or statements, submissions, comments or findings being made about his conduct, and
none of those things shall be regarded as infringing the privilege of either House of Parliament.
The waiver by one person of that protection does not affect its operation in relation to another person who has not waived it.
Nothing in this section affects any enactment or rule of law so far as it protects a person (including a person who has waived the protection referred to above) from legal liability for words spoken or things done in the course of, or for the purposes of or incidental to, any proceedings in Parliament.
Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (4), that subsection applies to— In this subsection “a committee” means a committee of either House or a joint committee of both Houses of Parliament.
the giving of evidence before either House or a committee;
the presentation or submission of a document to either House or a committee;
the preparation of a document for the purposes of or incidental to the transacting of any such business;
the formulation, making or publication of a document, including a report, by or pursuant to an order of either House or a committee; and
any communication with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards or any person having functions in connection with the registration of members' interests.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings in public before a court to which this section applies, if published contemporaneously with the proceedings, is absolutely privileged.
A report of proceedings which by an order of the court, or as a consequence of any statutory provision, is required to be postponed shall be treated as published contemporaneously if it is published as soon as practicable after publication is permitted.
This section applies to— In paragraph (a) “court” includes any tribunal or body exercising the judicial power of the State.
any court in the United Kingdom,
the European Court of Justice or any court attached to that court,
the European Court of Human Rights, and
any international criminal tribunal established by the Security Council of the United Nations or by an international agreement to which the United Kingdom is a party.
In section 8(6) of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 and in Article 9(6) of the Rehabilitation of Offenders (Northern Ireland) Order 1978 (defamation actions: reports of court proceedings), for “section 3 of the Law of Libel Amendment Act 1888” substitute “ section 14 of the Defamation Act 1996 ”.
This section applies to— and in paragraphs (a) and (b) “court” includes any tribunal or body exercising the judicial power of the State.
The publication of any report or other statement mentioned in Schedule 1 to this Act is privileged unless the publication is shown to be made with malice, subject as follows.
In defamation proceedings in respect of the publication of a report or other statement mentioned in Part II of that Schedule, there is no defence under this section if the plaintiff shows that the defendant— For this purpose “in a suitable manner” means in the same manner as the publication complained of or in a manner that is adequate and reasonable in the circumstances.
was requested by him to publish in a suitable manner a reasonable letter or statement by way of explanation or contradiction, and
refused or neglected to do so.
This section does not apply to the publication to the public, or a section of the public, of matter which is not of public concern public interest and the publication of which is not for the public benefit.
Nothing in this section shall be construed—
as protecting the publication of matter the publication of which is prohibited by law, or
as limiting or abridging any privilege subsisting apart from this section.
The enactments specified in Schedule 2 are repealed to the extent specified.
In this Act—
“publication” and “publish”, in relation to a statement, have the meaning they have for the purposes of the law of defamation generally, but “publisher” is specially defined for the purposes of section 1;
“statutory provision” means—
a provision contained in an Act or in subordinate legislation within the meaning of the Interpretation Act 1978, or
Section 15.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings in public of a legislature anywhere in the world.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings in public before a court anywhere in the world.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings in public of a person appointed to hold a public inquiry by a government or legislature anywhere in the world.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings in public anywhere in the world of an international organisation or an international conference.
A fair and accurate copy of or extract from any register or other document required by law to be open to public inspection.
A notice or advertisement published by or on the authority of a court, or of a judge or officer of a court, anywhere in the world.
A fair and accurate copy of or extract from matter published by or on the authority of a government or legislature anywhere in the world.
A fair and accurate copy of or extract from matter published anywhere in the world by an international organisation or an international conference.
A fair and accurate copy of or extract from a notice or other matter issued for the information of the public by or on behalf of— In this paragraph “ governmental functions ” includes police functions.
A fair and accurate copy of or extract from a document made available by a court in any member State or the European Court of Justice (or any court attached to that court), or by a judge or officer of any such court.
A fair and accurate copy of, extract from or summary of a notice or other matter issued for the information of the public by or on behalf of—
a legislature or government anywhere in the world;
an authority anywhere in the world performing governmental functions;
an international organisation or international conference.
In this paragraph “ governmental functions ” includes police functions.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings at any public meeting or sitting in the United Kingdom of— In the case of a local authority which are operating executive arrangements, a fair and accurate record of any decision made by any member of the executive where that record is required to be made and available for public inspection by virtue of section 22 of the Local Government Act 2000 or of any provision in regulations made under that section. In sub-paragraphs (1)(a) and (1A)—
“executive” and “executive arrangements” have the same meaning as in Part II of the Local Government Act 2000; A fair and accurate report of any corresponding proceedings in any of the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man or in another member State.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings at any public meeting held in a member State anywhere in the world. In this paragraph a “public meeting” means a meeting bona fide and lawfully held for a lawful purpose and for the furtherance or discussion of a matter of public concern public interest, whether admission to the meeting is general or restricted.
A fair and accurate copy of, extract from or summary of a document made available by a court anywhere in the world, or by a judge or officer of such a court.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings at a general meeting of a UK public company. A fair and accurate copy of or extract from any document circulated to members of a UK public company— A fair and accurate copy of or extract from any document circulated to members of a UK public company which relates to the appointment, resignation, retirement or dismissal of directors of the company. In this paragraph “ UK public company ” means— A fair and accurate report of proceedings at any corresponding meeting of, or copy of or extract from any corresponding document circulated to members of, a public company formed under the law of any of the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man or of another member State.
A fair and accurate report of any finding or decision of any of the following descriptions of association, formed in the United Kingdom or another member State anywhere in the world, or of any committee or governing body of such an association—
an association formed for the purpose of promoting or encouraging the exercise of or interest in any art, science, religion or learning, and empowered by its constitution to exercise control over or adjudicate on matters of interest or concern to the association, or the actions or conduct of any person subject to such control or adjudication;
an association formed for the purpose of promoting or safeguarding the interests of any trade, business, industry or profession, or of the persons carrying on or engaged in any trade, business, industry or profession, and empowered by its constitution to exercise control over or adjudicate upon matters connected with that trade, business, industry or profession, or the actions or conduct of those persons;
an association formed for the purpose of promoting or safeguarding the interests of a game, sport or pastime to the playing or exercise of which members of the public are invited or admitted, and empowered by its constitution to exercise control over or adjudicate upon persons connected with or taking part in the game, sport or pastime;
an association formed for the purpose of promoting charitable objects or other objects beneficial to the community and empowered by its constitution to exercise control over or to adjudicate on matters of interest or concern to the association, or the actions or conduct of any person subject to such control or adjudication.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings at a press conference held anywhere in the world for the discussion of a matter of public interest.
A fair and accurate report of proceedings at a general meeting of a listed company.
A fair and accurate copy of, extract from or summary of any document circulated to members of a listed company—
by or with the authority of the board of directors of the company,
by the auditors of the company, or
by any member of the company in pursuance of a right conferred by any statutory provision.
A fair and accurate copy of, extract from or summary of any document circulated to members of a listed company which relates to the appointment, resignation, retirement or dismissal of directors of the company or its auditors.
In this paragraph “listed company” has the same meaning as in Part 12 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009 (see section 1005 of that Act).
A fair and accurate—
report of proceedings of a scientific or academic conference held anywhere in the world, or
copy of, extract from or summary of matter published by such a conference.
In this Schedule— References in this Schedule to a member State include any European dependent territory of a member State. In paragraphs 2 and 6 “ court ” includes— In paragraphs 1, 3 and 7 “ legislature ” includes the European Parliament.
Provision may be made by order identifying— An order under this paragraph may be made— Subject to sub-paragraph (4), An order under this paragraph shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. An order under sub-paragraph (2)(c) shall be made by statutory rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules (Northern Ireland) Order 1979 and subject to negative resolution within the meaning of section 41(6) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954.
for Northern Ireland, by the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland
In this Schedule—
“court” includes—
any tribunal or body established under the law of any country or territory exercising the judicial power of the State;
any international tribunal established by the Security Council of the United Nations or by an international agreement;
any international tribunal deciding matters in dispute between States;
Section 16. Chapter Short title Extent of repeal 1888 c. 64. Law of Libel Amendment Act 1888. Section 3. 1952 c. 66. Defamation Act 1952. Section 4. Sections 7, 8 and 9(2) and (3). Section 16(2) and (3). The Schedule. 1955 c. 20. Revision of the Army and Air Force Acts (Transitional Provisions) Act 1955. In Schedule 2, the entry relating to the Defamation Act 1952. 1955 c. 11 (N.I.). Defamation Act (Northern Ireland) 1955. Section 4. Sections 7, 8 and 9(2) and (3). Section 14(2). The Schedule. 1972 c. 9 (N.I.). Local Government Act (Northern Ireland) 1972. In Schedule 8, paragraph 12. 1981 c. 49. Contempt of Court Act 1981. In section 4(3), the words “and of section 3 of the Law of Libel Amendment Act 1888 (privilege)”. 1981 c. 61. British Nationality Act 1981. In Schedule 7, the entries relating to the Defamation Act 1952 and the Defamation Act (Northern Ireland) 1955. 1985 c. 43. Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985. In Schedule 2, paragraphs 2 and 3. 1985 c. 61. Administration of Justice Act 1985. Section 57. S.I. 1986/594 (N.I. 3). Education and Libraries (Northern Ireland) Order 1986. Article 97(2). 1990 c. 42. Broadcasting Act 1990. Section 166(3). In Schedule 20, paragraphs 2 and 3.
a statutory provision within the meaning given by section 1(f) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954.
“statutory provision” means—
a provision contained in an Act of the Scottish Parliament or in an instrument made under such an Act,,or
a statutory provision within the meaning given by section 1(f) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The following provisions of this Act extend to England and Wales— section 1 (responsibility for publication), sections 2 to 4 (offer to make amends), except section 3(9), section 5 (time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood), section 7 (ruling on the meaning of a statement), sections 8 to 10 (summary disposal of claim), section 12(1) (evidence of convictions), section 13 (evidence concerning proceedings in Parliament), sections 14 and 15 and Schedule 1 (statutory privilege), section 16 and Schedule 2 (repeals) so far as relating to enactments extending to England and Wales, section 17(1) (interpretation), this subsection, section 19 (commencement) so far as relating to provisions which extend to England and Wales, and section 20 (short title and saving).
The following provisions of this Act extend to Scotland— ... ... section 12(2) (evidence of convictions), section 13 (evidence concerning proceedings in Parliament), ... section 16 and Schedule 2 (repeals) so far as relating to enactments extending to Scotland, section 17 (interpretation), this subsection, section 19 (commencement) so far as relating to provisions which extend to Scotland, and section 20 (short title and saving).
The following provisions of this Act extend to Northern Ireland— section 1 (responsibility for publication), sections 2 to 4 (offer to make amends), except section 3(9), section 6 (time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood), section 7 (ruling on the meaning of a statement), sections 8 to 11 (summary disposal of claim), section 12(3) (evidence of convictions), section 13 (evidence concerning proceedings in Parliament), sections 14 and 15 and Schedule 1 (statutory privilege), section 16 and Schedule 2 (repeals) so far as relating to enactments extending to Northern Ireland, section 17(1) (interpretation), this subsection, section 19 (commencement) so far as relating to provisions which extend to Northern Ireland, and section 20 (short title and saving).
Sections 18 to 20 (extent, commencement and other general provisions) come into force on Royal Assent.
The following provisions of this Act come into force at the end of the period of two months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed— section 1 (responsibility for publication), sections 5 and 6 (time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood), section 12 (evidence of convictions), section 13 (evidence concerning proceedings in Parliament), section 16 and the repeals in Schedule 2, so far as consequential on the above provisions, and section 17 (interpretation), so far as relating to the above provisions.
The provisions of this Act otherwise come into force on such day as may be appointed— and different days may be appointed for different purposes.
for England and Wales or Northern Ireland, by order of the Lord Chancellor, or
for Scotland, by order of the Secretary of State,
Any such order shall be made by statutory instrument and may contain such transitional provisions as appear to the Lord Chancellor or Secretary of State to be appropriate.
This Act may be cited as the Defamation Act 1996.
Nothing in this Act affects the law relating to criminal libel.