Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
This Act provides for the making of witness anonymity orders in relation to witnesses in criminal proceedings.
The common law rules relating to the power of a court to make an order for securing that the identity of a witness in criminal proceedings is withheld from the defendant (or, on a defence application, from other defendants) are abolished.
Nothing in this Act affects the common law rules as to the withholding of information on the grounds of public interest immunity.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In this Act a “witness anonymity order” is an order made by a court that requires such specified measures to be taken in relation to a witness in criminal proceedings as the court considers appropriate to ensure that the identity of the witness is not disclosed in or in connection with the proceedings.
The kinds of measures that may be required to be taken in relation to a witness include measures for securing one or more of the following—
that the witness’s name and other identifying details may be—
withheld;
removed from materials disclosed to any party to the proceedings;
that the witness may use a pseudonym;
that the witness is not asked questions of any specified description that might lead to the identification of the witness;
that the witness is screened to any specified extent;
that the witness’s voice is subjected to modulation to any specified extent.
Subsection (2) does not affect the generality of subsection (1).
Nothing in this section authorises the court to require—
the witness to be screened to such an extent that the witness cannot be seen by—
the judge or other members of the court (if any);
the jury (if there is one); or
any interpreter or other person appointed by the court to assist the witness;
the witness’s voice to be modulated to such an extent that the witness’s natural voice cannot be heard by any persons within paragraph (a)(i) to (iii).
In this section “specified” means specified in the witness anonymity order concerned.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
An application for a witness anonymity order to be made in relation to a witness in criminal proceedings may be made to the court by the prosecutor or the defendant.
Where an application is made by the prosecutor, the prosecutor—
must (unless the court directs otherwise) inform the court of the identity of the witness, but
is not required to disclose in connection with the application— to any other party to the proceedings or his or her legal representatives.
the identity of the witness, or
any information that might enable the witness to be identified,
Where an application is made by the defendant, the defendant—
must inform the court and the prosecutor of the identity of the witness, but
(if there is more than one defendant) is not required to disclose in connection with the application— to any other defendant or his or her legal representatives.
the identity of the witness, or
any information that might enable the witness to be identified,
Accordingly, where the prosecutor or the defendant proposes to make an application under this section in respect of a witness, any relevant material which is disclosed by or on behalf of that party before the determination of the application may be disclosed in such a way as to prevent— from being disclosed except as required by subsection (2)(a) or (3)(a).
the identity of the witness, or
any information that might enable the witness to be identified,
“Relevant material” means any document or other material which falls to be disclosed, or is sought to be relied on, by or on behalf of the party concerned in connection with the proceedings or proceedings preliminary to them.
The court must give every party to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard on an application under this section.
But subsection (6) does not prevent the court from hearing one or more parties in the absence of a defendant and his or her legal representatives, if it appears to the court to be appropriate to do so in the circumstances of the case.
Nothing in this section is to be taken as restricting any power to make rules of court.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
This section applies where an application is made for a witness anonymity order to be made in relation to a witness in criminal proceedings.
The court may make such an order only if it is satisfied that Conditions A to C below are met.
Condition A is that the measures to be specified in the order are necessary—
in order to protect the safety of the witness or another person or to prevent any serious damage to property, or
in order to prevent real harm to the public interest (whether affecting the carrying on of any activities in the public interest or the safety of a person involved in carrying on such activities, or otherwise).
Condition B is that, having regard to all the circumstances, the taking of those measures would be consistent with the defendant receiving a fair trial.
Condition C is that it is necessary to make the order in the interests of justice by reason of the fact that it appears to the court that—
it is important that the witness should testify, and
the witness would not testify if the order were not made.
In determining whether the measures to be specified in the order are necessary for the purpose mentioned in subsection (3)(a), the court must have regard (in particular) to any reasonable fear on the part of the witness— if the witness were to be identified.
that the witness or another person would suffer death or injury, or
that there would be serious damage to property,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
When deciding whether Conditions A to C in section 4 are met in the case of an application for a witness anonymity order, the court must have regard to—
the considerations mentioned in subsection (2) below, and
such other matters as the court considers relevant.
The considerations are—
the general right of a defendant in criminal proceedings to know the identity of a witness in the proceedings;
the extent to which the credibility of the witness concerned would be a relevant factor when the weight of his or her evidence comes to be assessed;
whether evidence given by the witness might be the sole or decisive evidence implicating the defendant;
whether the witness’s evidence could be properly tested (whether on grounds of credibility or otherwise) without his or her identity being disclosed;
whether there is any reason to believe that the witness— having regard (in particular) to any previous convictions of the witness and to any relationship between the witness and the defendant or any associates of the defendant;
has a tendency to be dishonest, or
has any motive to be dishonest in the circumstances of the case,
whether it would be reasonably practicable to protect the witness’s identity by any means other than by making a witness anonymity order specifying the measures that are under consideration by the court.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A court that has made a witness anonymity order in relation to any criminal proceedings may subsequently discharge or vary (or further vary) the order if it appears to the court to be appropriate to do so in view of the provisions of sections 4 and 5 that applied to the making of the order.
The court may do so—
on an application made by a party to the proceedings if there has been a material change of circumstances since the relevant time, or
on its own initiative.
“The relevant time” means—
the time when the order was made, or
if a previous application has been made under subsection (2), the time when the application (or the last application) was made.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subsection (2) applies where, on a trial on indictment with a jury, any evidence has been given by a witness at a time when a witness anonymity order applied to the witness.
The judge must give the jury such warning as the judge considers appropriate to ensure that the fact that the order was made in relation to the witness does not prejudice the defendant.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subsections (2) and (3) apply in relation to criminal proceedings before a service court consisting of a judge advocate and other members.
Any decision falling to be made by the court in such proceedings under sections 2 to 6 is to be made by the judge advocate alone.
If any evidence is given by a witness in such proceedings at a time when a witness anonymity order applies to the witness, the judge advocate must give the other members such warning as the judge advocate considers appropriate to ensure that the fact that the order was made in relation to the witness does not prejudice the defendant.
Each of the provisions mentioned in subsection (5) has effect with the modification set out in that subsection in a case where—
a witness anonymity order is made by a service court to which that provision applies, and
a person does anything in relation to the order which would, if the court had been a court of law having power to commit for contempt, have been contempt of that court.
In such a case—
section 101(1) of the Army Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 18) has effect with the omission of the words “not subject to military law”;
section 101(1) of the Air Force Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 19) has effect with the omission of the words “not subject to air-force law”; and
section 65(1) of the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (c. 53) has effect with the omission of the words “not subject to this Act”.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sections 2 to 8 apply to criminal proceedings in cases where—
the trial or hearing begins on or after the day on which this Act is passed, or
the trial or hearing has begun, but has not ended, before that day.
Section 10 applies to certain proceedings falling within subsection (1)(b).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
the trial or hearing has begun, but has not ended, before commencement, and
the court has made a pre-commencement anonymity order in relation to a witness at the trial or hearing.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
must consider whether that order was one that the court could have made if this Act had been in force at the material time,
if it considers that that order was one that it could have made in those circumstances, may direct that the order is to remain in place, and
otherwise, must discharge the order and consider whether instead it should make a witness anonymity order in relation to the witness in accordance with sections 2 to 5.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
whether the order was one that the court could have made if this Act had been in force at the material time, and
whether the court should exercise any power to give a direction to the jury (if there is one) regarding the evidence given under the terms of the order.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In this section—
in relation to England and Wales, a magistrates' court, the Crown Court or the criminal division of the Court of Appeal;
“prosecutor” means an individual or body charged with duties to conduct criminal prosecutions;
“the defendant”, in relation to any criminal proceedings, means any person charged with an offence to which the proceedings relate (whether or not convicted);
This section applies where—
an appeal court is considering an appeal against a conviction in criminal proceedings in a case where the trial ended before commencement, and
the court from which the appeal lies (“the trial court”) made a pre-commencement anonymity order in relation to a witness at the trial.
The appeal court—
may not treat the conviction as unsafe solely on the ground that the trial court had no power at common law to make the order mentioned in subsection (1)(b), but
must treat the conviction as unsafe if it considers—
that the order was not one that the trial court could have made if this Act had been in force at the material time, and
that, as a result of the order, the defendant did not receive a fair trial.
In this section—
“appeal court” means—
the Court of Appeal;
“commencement” means the day on which this Act is passed;
the Courts-Martial Appeal Court or the Court Martial Appeal Court;
“criminal proceedings” means—
In this Act—
the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland; or
in relation to England and Wales, a magistrates' court, the Crown Court or the criminal division of the Court of Appeal;
the Court of Appeal;
“court” means—
a service court;
In this Act “service court” means—
a court-martial constituted under the Army Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 18), the Air Force Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 19) or the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (c. 53) or the Court Martial established by the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52);
the Summary Appeal Court established by any of those Acts;
a Standing Civilian Court established under the Armed Forces Act 1976 (c. 52) or the Service Civilian Court established by the Armed Forces Act 2006; or
the Courts-Martial Appeal Court or the Court Martial Appeal Court.
In this Act “service offence” means—
any offence against any provision of Part 2 of the Army Act 1955, Part 2 of the Air Force Act 1955 or Part 1 of the Naval Discipline Act 1957; or
any offence under Part 1 of the Armed Forces Act 2006.
This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
No witness anonymity order may be made under this Act after the relevant date.
Subject to subsection (3), the relevant date is 31 December 2009.
The Secretary of State may by order provide for the relevant date to be a date specified in the order that falls not more than 12 months after—
31 December 2009, or
(if an order has already been made under this subsection) the date specified in the last order.
Nothing in this section affects—
the continuation in effect of a witness anonymity order made before the relevant date, or
the power to discharge or vary such an order under section 6.
An order under subsection (3)—
is to be made by statutory instrument; and
may not be made unless a draft of the instrument containing the order has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.
This Act may be cited as the Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008.
Subject to subsection (3), this Act extends to England and Wales and Northern Ireland.
The service courts provisions of this Act extend to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland; and in section 384 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52) (extent to Channel Islands etc.) any reference to that Act includes a reference to the service courts provisions of this Act.
In subsection (3) “the service courts provisions of this Act” means the provisions of this Act so far as having effect in relation to service courts.